Are the posted questions getting worse?

  • Michael L John - Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:10 PM

    It's 70 and sunny. In Pittsburgh. In February. That's the reason.

    You have the same weather we do in Detroit.  Wait until the weekend - it'll change.

  • Snow as come and gone today here in Colorado Springs.

  • jasona.work - Thursday, February 23, 2017 2:19 PM

    Someone, somewhere, is up to mischief...

    That would be me. 😉

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:05 PM

    It's cold and snowy. That's the reason.

    Overcast, raining and cold. And it's still summer here. 🙁

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
  • Ed Wagner - Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:14 PM

    Michael L John - Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:10 PM

    It's 70 and sunny. In Pittsburgh. In February. That's the reason.

    You have the same weather we do in Detroit.  Wait until the weekend - it'll change.

    Considering they're currently predicting heavy rain, thunderstorms, high winds, possible tornados(!!), and down into the 40s or so by Sunday, you're not wrong...

    /Me heads home to test my generator out and bring the extension cords for the sump pump and fridge out of the basement

  • GilaMonster - Friday, February 24, 2017 2:10 AM

    Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:05 PM

    It's cold and snowy. That's the reason.

    Overcast, raining and cold. And it's still summer here. 🙁

    I believe Gauteng is getting a lot more rain than usual, linked to the recent storm in Mozambique or did that just hit Limpopo?

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This thing is addressing problems that dont exist. Its solution-ism at its worst. We are dumbing down machines that are inherently superior. - Gilfoyle

  • Henrico Bekker - Friday, February 24, 2017 6:57 AM

    GilaMonster - Friday, February 24, 2017 2:10 AM

    Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:05 PM

    It's cold and snowy. That's the reason.

    Overcast, raining and cold. And it's still summer here. 🙁

    I believe Gauteng is getting a lot more rain than usual, linked to the recent storm in Mozambique or did that just hit Limpopo?

    I doubt the storm itself made it ~700km inland and to an altitude of 2km. I think this rain is linked, not directly the same storm but an effect. The storm hit the coast on Saturday iirc, rains started here on Tuesday

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
  • Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

  • jasona.work - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:04 AM

    Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

    Yes this guy is complete asshole. It doesn't take a lot of thought to realize this guy acted deliberately to sabotage his employer. The lawyer who filed the suit made a mistake in the verbiage of the suit but there really can be no doubt that the intention of this person was to destroy the company. It will be interesting to see how this plays out but in my mind this is pretty the same type of behavior as a person taking a baseball bat to the property of the company. It was malicious, intentional and hateful. Sure the company treated him like a piece of trash but that does NOT give him the freedom to ruin the company. If he felt he was wrongly treated he should have sought legal counsel instead of acting like a three year old when somebody takes away his toy truck. I hope they find this guy guilty but I have a feeling he will walk away thanks to the inept lawyer. Gosh this kind of sounds like HR creating the verbiage for a new hire posting.

    _______________________________________________________________

    Need help? Help us help you.

    Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.

    Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.

    Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
    Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
    Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
    Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/

  • Sean Lange - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:38 AM

    jasona.work - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:04 AM

    Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

    Yes this guy is complete asshole. It doesn't take a real lot of thought to realize this guy acted deliberately to sabotage his employer. The lawyer who filed the suit made a mistake in the verbiage of the suit but there really can be no doubt that the intention of this person was to destroy the company. It will be interesting to see how this plays out but in mind this is pretty the same type of behavior as a person taking a baseball bat to the property of the company. It was malicious, intentional and hateful. Sure the company treated him like a piece of trash but that does NOT give him the freedom to ruin the company. If he felt he was wrongly treated he should have sought legal counsel instead of acting like a three year old when somebody takes away his toy truck. I hope they find this guy guilty but I have a feeling he will walk away thanks to the inept lawyer. Gosh this kind of sounds like HR creating the verbiage for a new hire posting.

    In his defense, he left backups available. He didn't try to ruin the company, he just left problems.

    Luis C.
    General Disclaimer:
    Are you seriously taking the advice and code from someone from the internet without testing it? Do you at least understand it? Or can it easily kill your server?

    How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help: Option 1 / Option 2
  • Sean Lange - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:38 AM

    jasona.work - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:04 AM

    Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

    Yes this guy is complete asshole. It doesn't take a real lot of thought to realize this guy acted deliberately to sabotage his employer. The lawyer who filed the suit made a mistake in the verbiage of the suit but there really can be no doubt that the intention of this person was to destroy the company. It will be interesting to see how this plays out but in mind this is pretty the same type of behavior as a person taking a baseball bat to the property of the company. It was malicious, intentional and hateful. Sure the company treated him like a piece of trash but that does NOT give him the freedom to ruin the company. If he felt he was wrongly treated he should have sought legal counsel instead of acting like a three year old when somebody takes away his toy truck. I hope they find this guy guilty but I have a feeling he will walk away thanks to the inept lawyer. Gosh this kind of sounds like HR creating the verbiage for a new hire posting.

    Actually, the guy involved in this suit isn't the one who was let go from the company, he was hired by the guy who was let go (and it sounds like he was quite angry over the treatment of the first guy.)

    But still, I don't see him winning this appeal and I do see this leading to some tightened up language in contracts for sysadmins.  Because this was malicious at a minimum, which means you're talking malicious destruction of property (the backups, etc.)  It's one thing to be told "you are responsible for our entire IT infrastructure, including cleaning up / removing backups / files / etc," and being told "take a baseball bat to our server racks if you want to."  If you presume the first includes the second, you're very, very, very wrong.

  • Luis Cazares - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:44 AM

    Sean Lange - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:38 AM

    jasona.work - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:04 AM

    Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

    Yes this guy is complete asshole. It doesn't take a real lot of thought to realize this guy acted deliberately to sabotage his employer. The lawyer who filed the suit made a mistake in the verbiage of the suit but there really can be no doubt that the intention of this person was to destroy the company. It will be interesting to see how this plays out but in mind this is pretty the same type of behavior as a person taking a baseball bat to the property of the company. It was malicious, intentional and hateful. Sure the company treated him like a piece of trash but that does NOT give him the freedom to ruin the company. If he felt he was wrongly treated he should have sought legal counsel instead of acting like a three year old when somebody takes away his toy truck. I hope they find this guy guilty but I have a feeling he will walk away thanks to the inept lawyer. Gosh this kind of sounds like HR creating the verbiage for a new hire posting.

    In his defense, he left backups available. He didn't try to ruin the company, he just left problems.

    He did more than leave problems. He intentionally disrupted their business then walked away. To sour the water even further he offered to be hired back as a consultant to unravel the mess he left them in. I am sorry but there is no defense for this type of behavior. He did this deliberately and even attempted to profit by his vandalism.

    _______________________________________________________________

    Need help? Help us help you.

    Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.

    Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.

    Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
    Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
    Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
    Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/

  • jasona.work - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:04 AM

    Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

    What. a. loser.

    "The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
    - Theodore Roosevelt

    Author of:
    SQL Server Execution Plans
    SQL Server Query Performance Tuning

  • Crazy, revenge on employers rarely works out well for anyone.

  • jasona.work - Friday, February 24, 2017 10:04 AM

    Well, this could have some interesting implications for sysadmins: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/michael_thomas_appeals_conviction/
    "I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court"

    Regardless of whether the guy wins or loses his appeal...

    Ouch. That is really going to cause issues in a lot of places.

    Brandie Tarvin, MCITP Database AdministratorLiveJournal Blog: http://brandietarvin.livejournal.com/[/url]On LinkedIn!, Google+, and Twitter.Freelance Writer: ShadowrunLatchkeys: Nevermore, Latchkeys: The Bootleg War, and Latchkeys: Roscoes in the Night are now available on Nook and Kindle.

Viewing 15 posts - 57,526 through 57,540 (of 66,549 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply