These will get pretty long as I'm kind of wordy, but these are impressions as things are occurring.
Registration is a little crazy. I'm not sure who desgined this
conference, but it's split among the two sides of the conference center
in Orlando. I've attended 3 or 4 Tech Eds, a couple PDCs, and half a
dozen other conferences. In all of the cases, the entire conference is
in one building. A big one, but one building. Here the keynote is in
the west center and the show/expo, and the backpack you get loaded with
marketing material and swag, is in the South center. If you've never
seen the Orlando convention center, that's a big deal. There's a 1/2
mile walk outside in the Florida heat between them. Not a big deal to
me, since I like the heat, but I sweat, so it's not so nice for my
I arrived late, and it was packed. If you've attended others,
you know that it's usually the case you have 4 or so large screens. It
seems most conferences have moved towards dual screens, showing the
speaker on one and a computer on the other. The recent BI conference
had 2 pairs of screens. TechEd has 6 pairs. It's a big show.
Talking about models for optimization of your IT processes. It's
a good idea and I think we need more reference models and also most
explanations on how to map our internal IT processes to the model.
Energizer - The first video was from Envergizer, which was also
a featured company with the BI conference. They must be a heavy
Microsoft user. Their initial plan was to be 2 years behind any release
of software. Sharepoint is a featured, which shows just how much focus
is being put on thie particular piece of software.
The focus on IT this year seems to be working on an agile,
rapidly changeably infrastructure, being able to move in real-time.
- Connections more pervasive
- reponse time expectations are shrinking.
- technology can really enable differentiation.
- relationships are online and short-lived (is this true? Or has
business pushed us this way? In some ways it has, in others it hasn't.)
- Agility is hard. It seems that the gap between agile and
not-so-agile companies is growing. Agility is sensing a change and
efficiently and rapidly responding.
- 70% of IT budgets maintaining. But successful companies have moved that to 50-50.
- Focus on costs, cost based on usage, not more efficiency. A utiltiy model
- Quality of service with management based on
policies. Matching up what IT can do with the business needs. Not
everything needs 5 9s or subsecond response.
- be agile. infrastructure is more dynamic.
- Need to build other metrics besides cost to allow you to measure this and improve it.
- Ask business what they need and translate those needs into measures and begin to work with those measures.
- Gartnew has an IT maturity model
- Focus on process, technology, and culture. All three are important.
- Don't use long-termprojects. They usually
fail. Work on smaller pieces instead with ROI measured in each stage.
Not just cost, but also quality, and agility. Usually it is cost
recovery in early stages with later stages needing investment to gain
on quality and agility.
XEN open source software is including Microsoft interoperability
in their distrobutions. Licensing agreements are occuring, so it seems
thatt Microsoft is trying to work with open source software.
There was a good docus on the interoperability and the efforts
their making to work with other software and embrace stadnards. I'm not
sure how much I believe it, but they do seem to be working a bit better
with ther systems. Is it Microsoft or the toher companies?
The Back to the Future car was on stage and Christopher Lloyd
showed up on stage a few times. Microsoft does go all out at
TechEd and they usually have some godo guests.
Windows Server 2008 Demo
- Server Core - Minimal installation option for
specialized installation. This means that a file server canjust have
the file server services. Good for virtualization. IIS, file server, AD
server can be roles. Only a command line interface for server admin.
- Virtual Server lets you use multicore cpus.
- System Center has a virtual server manager. VMWare
machines can be converted to MS virtual machines. Built on powershell.
- Physical servers can be converted to virtual machines.
- move VMs from one host to another. Quick Migration is the option that you can do today with Virtual Server.
- Demo was a bit fast, but well delivered.
- New model driven management tools
- System Center, Operations Manager, modeling
applications for a company. Operations Manager can see errors, like web
erors. There is a "Problem Path" section that can highlight all the
components showing errors. A lot of design and documentation work to
get things set, but it certainly could assist your production team in
managing servers. Not sure about security, rights, etc., but it's a
good idea in general.
- Katmai - Policies in Management Studio, and
we can set policies for servers. This allows us to set settings for
standards and I can now see if a database is not set according to
policy. Things like db options, etc. These can rollup to System Center.
SML is a theme. This seems like the next wave of XML use in Microsoft.
We had the XML for visual displays in Vista, and now we're seeing SML
for system modeling.
Services are important. One of the four pillars that Microsoft is
pushing is the need for software services. SOA is definitely something
to watch and learn a bit more about. BizTalk has been working with
"services in the cloud" where disparate companies can easily set up
services that they can use to talk to each other. Not sure how well
this will take off, but it's interesting.
Kind of a cool demo showing the Dundas technology Microsoft has
licensed for Reporting Services 2008. An easy to build report with a
map control in it. At the BI conference, I also saw the Excel and Word
integration technologies for building reports. The rest of the demo was
a bit drab. Not a great presented, and it seemed that they were trying
to push Biztalk, but I didn't really see it as a great technology to
use. Maybe I don't get it, but I think if I don't, then most people
It's nice to see that Microsoft hasn't forgotten the user experience.
The fourth pillar was absed on the user interface, and featured
:Expression, silverlight, and Office with Visual studio. VS2008 was
used with the office tools included. An extension to Outlook was built.
I can see people getting a little crazy with this, but it's a good
idea. Getting more, rich Outlook messages is a good step to ensuring
people stick with the platform. And it makes for a better experience as
well. But it does tie you tighter to Microsoft. I'm ok with it, but
some people may be concerned. I think this is mostly for internal mail,
so I'm not sure what would happen when it transitions outside your
Losing my battery, more later.