I guess I did a good job, with all 3s and 4s in my eval (meaning good and great) for the presentation. That was good as I struggled with a projector that cut off my slides (something to be aware of for next time.
In terms of the presentation, here were the items:
Poor | Average | Good | Excellent | |
Session overall: | ||||
How easy was the Session to understand? | 2 | 16 | ||
Was the content suited to your requirements? | 3 | 15 | ||
Were the topics covered in sufficient detail? | 2 | 17 | ||
Would you recommend this Session to others? | 1 | 18 | ||
Overall rating of the Session? | 1 | 13 |
Poor | Average | Good | Excellent | |
Instructor: | ||||
Ability to provide real world experience? | 1 | 18 | ||
Ability to respond appropriately to questions? | 1 | 12 | ||
How well prepared was the instructor? | 3 | 16 | ||
Knowledge of subject matter? | 1 | 18 | ||
Presentation abilities? | 1 | 17 | ||
Overall rating of instructor? | 1 | 18 |
The suggestions I got were good, and I had a few that I need to address in the next presentation:
- find examples of people with lower profiles.
- Talk about more differentiation of personal and private profiles
- More on the physical resume
- Talk about privacy items
I'll work on those, and hopefully address some in October when I give this one again.
