I’m A Candidate For The 2014 PASS Nomination Committee

Kendal Van Dyke, 2014-06-03

The 2014 PASS election cycle begins today when voting opens for the Nomination Committee (NomCom) and I’m one of eleven candidates running for three seats on the committee.

Why am I running for the NomCom?
  • It’s a chance to use my time and experience to do something good for PASS.
  • This year’s NomCom will have the chance to review the election process and recommend changes. I was vocal about this after last year’s election and I’m putting my money where my mouth is – I’d like to help improve the process.
  • It’s a change for me personally to do something new while doing something to help PASS.
Why am I qualified?

I have been involved with PASS since 2007 at all levels: speaker, chapter leader, regional mentor, SQLSaturday organizer, and I served as a member of the Board in 2012. I have also run for the Board of Directors twice so I have a good understanding of how the NomCom works. My familiarity with PASS from the grassroots all the way up to HQ gives me invaluable experience to draw on when evaluating the candidates running for the Board. I was also called on as an advisor for the original Election Review Committee a few years ago; that means I know how we’ve gotten to where we are today and can use that to make recommendations for improving future elections.

What can you expect if I’m elected?
  • I’ll ask difficult – but relevant – questions. In past NomCom interviews I expected tough questions about strategy, vision for PASS, etc. and being surprised that they weren’t asked. I appreciate that Board members are volunteers, but we’re asking them to be a part of managing a community with an annual budget of $8 million USD and it’s the NomCom’s job to ensure each candidate has the right mix of business acumen and connection with the community that make them qualified to run for the Board.
  • I’ll be fair to all candidates. No bias because I may know someone or passing judgment because I don’t agree with how they think PASS should be run.
  • I’ll push for changes to the voting process that reduce the possibility of duplicate votes. The current NomCom process works (for the most part) and doesn’t require any major overhaul, but having the possibility exist for duplicate votes is a problem that we cannot ignore and need to fix. I understand that it’s not a simple effort so understand that any changes will likely take effect in the 2015 elections.
  • I’ll be transparent about the NomCom experience – if elected I commit to blogging once every 2 weeks (or more) about NomCom timelines and progress, lessons learned, and what to expect next. Note that some parts of the NomCom process are under NDA so I can’t blog about them, but I will be as open as possible.

Ballots should be mailed today and I encourage you to take a minute to review all 11 candidates along with my application and qualifications before casting your vote.

Thanks for your support!

Rate

Share

Share

Rate

Related content

Database Mirroring FAQ: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup?

Question: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? This question was sent to me via email. My reply follows. Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? Databases to be mirrored are currently running on 2005 SQL instances but will be upgraded to 2008 SQL in the near future.

Robert Davis

2009-02-23

1,567 reads

Networking – Part 4

You may want to read Part 1 , Part 2 , and Part 3 before continuing. This time around I’d like to talk about social networking. We’ll start with social networking. Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are all good examples of using technology to let…

Andy Warren

2009-02-17

1,530 reads

Speaking at Community Events – More Thoughts

Last week I posted Speaking at Community Events – Time to Raise the Bar?, a first cut at talking about to what degree we should require experience for speakers at events like SQLSaturday as well as when it might be appropriate to add additional focus/limitations on the presentations that are accepted. I’ve got a few more thoughts on the topic this week, and I look forward to your comments.

Andy Warren

2009-02-13

360 reads