Partitioning Part 4 Posted on SSC
Partitioning Part 4 concludes the series with a look at 'real' partitioning in SQL 2005 Enterprise Edition. Overall the series...
2008-01-17
569 reads
Partitioning Part 4 concludes the series with a look at 'real' partitioning in SQL 2005 Enterprise Edition. Overall the series...
2008-01-17
569 reads
Just posted on Jonathan Schartz's blog. They've definitely been playing more in the open source arena, now they've got a...
2008-01-16
643 reads
I'll be attending the South Florida Code Camp on Feb 2 and also SQLSaturday Tampa on Feb 16th. For both...
2008-01-16
533 reads
I was discussing the Kindle recently with business partner Steve Jones and while we both like the idea of having...
2008-01-14
497 reads
Speakers tend to live for the evals. Hopefully it's a validation of work done well after a lot of time...
2008-01-09
919 reads
Spotted this on the Webware feed, Earth Class Mail is a service that opens and scans your regular mail so...
2008-01-09
500 reads
Many posts including this one about as many as 70,000 sites being hacked using SQL injection and a vulnerability in...
2008-01-09
633 reads
Continuing on with his series on SQL Server table partitioning, Andy Warren takes a look at how partitioned views are handled when you query them.
2008-01-08
8,277 reads
Part looks at using views for partitioning, still a valid technique even in the SQL 2005 world. I added in...
2008-01-08
261 reads
If you happen to read ACM Queue there is a great article in the Nov/Dec 2007 issue called 'A Conversation...
2008-01-07
281 reads
By ReviewMyDB
The T-SQL Tuesday #201 round-up: nine bloggers on whether temp tables are a friend...
By Steve Jones
I have been experimenting with MCP servers in a few ways, including the Redgate...
By Zikato
I deployed a schema change to 30 servers using multi-server query and deploy-at-low-priority. Small...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Admin Rights for Everyone
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Kerberos Authentication for Aurora PostgreSQL:...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item RegEx Functions I
Which of these RegEx functions need compatibility level 170 in SQL Server 2025?
See possible answers