Partitioning Part 4 Posted on SSC
Partitioning Part 4 concludes the series with a look at 'real' partitioning in SQL 2005 Enterprise Edition. Overall the series...
2008-01-17
566 reads
Partitioning Part 4 concludes the series with a look at 'real' partitioning in SQL 2005 Enterprise Edition. Overall the series...
2008-01-17
566 reads
Just posted on Jonathan Schartz's blog. They've definitely been playing more in the open source arena, now they've got a...
2008-01-16
642 reads
I'll be attending the South Florida Code Camp on Feb 2 and also SQLSaturday Tampa on Feb 16th. For both...
2008-01-16
530 reads
I was discussing the Kindle recently with business partner Steve Jones and while we both like the idea of having...
2008-01-14
496 reads
Speakers tend to live for the evals. Hopefully it's a validation of work done well after a lot of time...
2008-01-09
914 reads
Spotted this on the Webware feed, Earth Class Mail is a service that opens and scans your regular mail so...
2008-01-09
499 reads
Many posts including this one about as many as 70,000 sites being hacked using SQL injection and a vulnerability in...
2008-01-09
630 reads
Continuing on with his series on SQL Server table partitioning, Andy Warren takes a look at how partitioned views are handled when you query them.
2008-01-08
8,271 reads
Part looks at using views for partitioning, still a valid technique even in the SQL 2005 world. I added in...
2008-01-08
259 reads
If you happen to read ACM Queue there is a great article in the Nov/Dec 2007 issue called 'A Conversation...
2008-01-07
280 reads
By Steve Jones
I’m sure many of you are using AI regularly, perhaps chatting, perhaps using some...
By Vinay Thakur
This blog series on Audit/Compliance/Security, this is first blog where we would discuss about...
In the previous post, we've built a SQL Server 2025 sandbox in an OrbStack...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Can You Really Downgrade from...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item What is CPU Usage?
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Limiting Checkpoints
If I use the -k parameter with a number after it, what does this change in SQL Server?
See possible answers