Tony Davis

  • Interests: football, modern literature, real ale

SQLServerCentral Editorial

The Wild Fringes of SQL Server Development

We can now clearly see two opposing trends in the way SQL Server is being used in applications. The dumb database brigade regards SQL Server as simply a 'data dump'. The 'database fanatics' think SQL Server on its own can meet the needs of all but the most demanding applications. Can these opposing trends be reconciled? Tony Davis would like to think so.

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2008-12-01

227 reads

SQLServerCentral Editorial

Barriers to Entry, Database Weekly (Oct 27 2008)

Many people who spend time contributing to technical forums bemoan the increasing amount of time and energy they expend trying to help people who seem unwilling or unable to help themselves. At the same time, they say, the courtesy is deteriorating and the number of people willing to "stir things up" for the sake of it increases. Is there a solution to this?

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2008-10-27

110 reads

SQLServerCentral Editorial

Dataphor

Over the years, there have been several attempts to turn conventional RDBMSs into object relational databases, by inserting an intermediate layer. The driving force behind this was the generally-held assumption that the relational model could not handle complex data types.

(1)

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2008-06-24

289 reads

SQLServerCentral Editorial

Rules, Defaults and the SQL Standard

I see, with some relief that the threatened removal of Rules and Defaults in SQL Server 2008 hasn’t happened. There has been a stay of execution. Even though they are documented, they still come with a dire warning that they are deprecated and will be removed in future versions. They have fallen foul of the SQL Standards committee, and we are now supposed to use check constraints instead.

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2008-06-23

181 reads

SQLServerCentral Editorial

Open Source and SQL Server communities

The other day, I was chatting to a keen PostgreSQL user. We're used to having free databases, such as IBM DB2 Express-C, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition, SQLite and Oracle XE, but PostgreSQL is different in that it is open source. It is a proper, dedicated community too, I was told...

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2008-06-09

118 reads

Blogs

Building the Team: Roles and Responsibilities in FinOps

By

In my experience, FinOps success has never been just about tools or dashboards. It...

Tooling for Success: The Best FinOps Tools and Technologies

By

As a DevOps person, I know that to make FinOps successful, you need more...

From Planning to Practice: Setting Up Your FinOps Framework

By

As someone who works in DevOps, I’m always focused on creating systems that are...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Restoring On Top II

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Restoring On Top II

SQL Art 2: St Patrick’s Day in SSMS (Shamrock + Pint + Pixel Text)

By Terry Jago

Comments posted to this topic are about the item SQL Art 2: St Patrick’s...

Breaking Down Your Work

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Breaking Down Your Work

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Restoring On Top II

I have a database, DNRTest, that has a number of tables and other objects in it. The other day, I was trying to mock up a test and ran this code on the same server:

-- run yesterday
CREATE DATABASE DNRTest2
GO
USE DNRTest2
GO
CREATE TABLE NewTable (id INT)
GO
Today, I realize that I need a copy of DNRTest for another mockup, and I run this:
-- run today
USE Master
BACKUP DATABASE DNRTest TO DISK = 'dnrtest.bak'
GO
RESTORE DATABASE DNRTest2 FROM DISK = 'dnrtest.bak' WITH REPLACE
What happens?

See possible answers