Technical Article

Performance problem in SQL Server 2005

I have written stored procedure which simply read each row one by one and update the some column in same table.SP is running fine in SQL Server 2000 and completed within 5 minutes (around 5 million rows)But same SP in SQL Server 2005, its taking around more than one hour (for same number of rows)Note: […]

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2007-07-16

508 reads

Blogs

First Time Speaking with a Mask at an Event

By

Over the past couple of months, I have started losing my ability to talk...

A New Word: Apolytus

By

apolytus– n. the moment you realize you are changing as a person, finally outgrowing...

Tired of Tedious SQL Queries? AI Tools Can Automate The Boring Parts

By

If you've ever wrestled with complex SQL code, you know the drill. Hours spent...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Slow update on temp table

By dpaproskijr

I have a job running each night starting at 4:30AM and usually finishing at...

Table Partitioning - remove null range

By goher2000

hi guys,   I have a partitioned table AM_ITM_INSTNC_MSS and I want to  get...

Principal owns a service?

By Brandie Tarvin

This is one I haven't seen before. I'm trying to drop a database user...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Read Only Replica in SQL Server Standard

Our environment runs using SQL Server Standard. We are implementing Availability groups. Our database has been experiencing high read volumes, so I want to let the application read the Synchronized Secondary replica, as I read that HADR does this. Can we implement this?

See possible answers