Technical Article

Performance problem in SQL Server 2005

I have written stored procedure which simply read each row one by one and update the some column in same table.SP is running fine in SQL Server 2000 and completed within 5 minutes (around 5 million rows)But same SP in SQL Server 2005, its taking around more than one hour (for same number of rows)Note: […]

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2007-07-16

508 reads

Blogs

Cloud Databases Made Simple: Creating Your First AWS RDS Instance

By

I recently started full time learning of Amazon Web Services (AWS). I found that...

First Time Speaking with a Mask at an Event

By

Over the past couple of months, I have started losing my ability to talk...

A New Word: Apolytus

By

apolytus– n. the moment you realize you are changing as a person, finally outgrowing...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Data Archival: 1 table (Database A) to 1 table (Database B)

By Tava

I'm currently in the process of building an archival  & reporting solution and just...

Hardcoded filter vs filter by parameter

By blom0344

I am trying to set a date filter on several  large transaction tables to...

Do you listen to music when you work?

By Louis Davidson (@drsql)

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Do you listen to music...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Read Only Replica in SQL Server Standard

Our environment runs using SQL Server Standard. We are implementing Availability groups. Our database has been experiencing high read volumes, so I want to let the application read the Synchronized Secondary replica, as I read that HADR does this. Can we implement this?

See possible answers