Jonathan Stokes


SQLServerCentral Article

DTS Standards

SQL Server 2000 brought us DTS, a new way of working with data movement for SQL Server DBAs. However, unlike Integration Services and Project REAL, there weren't any great standards for working with this tool and building portable solutions was hard. Jonathan Stokes brings us a great article on how you can create a standard structure for your packages and make them more portable.

5 (1)

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2005-11-21

8,606 reads

SQLServerCentral Article

Portable DTS Packages

Moving DTS Packages from one SQL Server 2000 server to another can be a real hassle. There are any number of issues that occur whenever you seek to use a package on different servers. New author Jonathan Stokes brings us a technique he's used many times to build portable DTS packages.

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2005-07-25

11,475 reads

Blogs

Redgate Summit Comes to the Windy City

By

I love Chicago. I went to visit three times in 2023: a Redgate event,...

Non-Functional Requirements

By

I have found that non-functional requirements (NFRs) can be hard to define for a...

Degrees and Trade Schools

By

Can we normalize a couple of things? 1 – Trade Schools. Back in the...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

AG listener cant be removed

By ysalem

Testing with AG on Linux with Cluster=NONE. it was all going ok and as...

Remove comma inside Comma Delimited File csv in SSIS Using Script task

By hongho2

Hi, I have two tables: one for headers with 9 fields and another for...

Inserting 100K rows Performance - Baseline Performance

By MichaelT

We're trying to understand how quick new versions of SQL server can be.  Obviously...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

The "ORDER BY" clause behavior

Let’s consider the following script that can be executed without any error on both SQL Sever and PostgreSQL. We define the table t1 in which we insert three records:

create table t1 (id int primary key, city varchar(50));

insert into t1 values (1, 'Rome'), (2, 'New York'), (3, NULL);
If we execute the following query, how will the records be sorted in both environments?
select city

from t1

order by city;

See possible answers