External Article

Making a more reliable and flexible sp_MSforeachdb

While the system procedure sp_MSforeachdb is neither documented nor officially supported, most SQL Server professionals have used it at one time or another. This is typically for ad hoc maintenance tasks, but many people (myself included) have used this type of looping activity in permanent routines. Sadly, I have discovered instances where, under heavy load and/or with a large number of databases, the procedure can actually skip multiple catalogs with no error or warning message. Since this situation is not easily reproducible, and since Microsoft typically has no interest in fixing unsupported objects, this may be happening in your environment right now

SQLServerCentral Editorial

ETL Security Holes

The growth of ETL processes and secondary systems for reporting, decision support and other analysis creates an issue. Steve Jones points out that we ought to be remembering that security needs to be applied to data, not just systems.

Blogs

Measuring RAG Solutions: Are We Retrieving the Right Information?

By

A RAG pipeline that answers questions in the demo is not the same thing...

Advice I Like: Lots of Ideas

By

“A multitude of bad ideas is necessary for one good idea” – from Excellent...

Building a DBA Agent for Your SQL Server Estate with MCP

By

Yesterday I gave a talk for MSSQLTips called “Building a DBA Agent for Your...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

How do I connect to a SQL Server database on my ISP?

By Doctor Who 2

I've got a web application for my side business. I've added a SQL Server...

Looking for New Blood

By Grant Fritchey

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Looking for New Blood

Server-Level Row Counts for Tables and Views

By Artur Sanin

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Server-Level Row Counts for Tables...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Hyperscale Replicas I

What types of secondary replicas are available for the Azure SQL Database Hyperscale edition?

See possible answers