Viewing 15 posts - 24,886 through 24,900 (of 39,810 total)
The link is broken, but I've contacted Paul.
March 7, 2009 at 10:46 am
Paul,
I think you're in a good situation, and I've had a few of those, but there are many in upper management that don't see things the same. If you'd like...
March 7, 2009 at 10:37 am
song lines now? Flash Gordon?
I rented that for my kids last year. They loved it.
March 7, 2009 at 10:34 am
Surprisingly there isn't a lot of poking fun in the MVP forums, except at each other.
I'm not sure how I'd choose people to get in. Likely based on past actions...
March 7, 2009 at 10:26 am
Hey, we posted the same time. Thanks for the great complement. I appreciate that.
On the experts exchange, I've resisted that, but I think there might be some value there. I...
March 6, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Tim,
I think you did a good job creating this thread, and it's good to stop and think periodically about why I do this, and do I still like it. Thanks...
March 6, 2009 at 4:12 pm
I don't see how comments are rated in the New Scientist thing. I missing something?
I'm not sure of the benefit to users of ranking things. I guess they could find...
March 6, 2009 at 4:10 pm
I ask David about the bike regularly, and I'm always amazed he's riding in the rain. I think riding every day is a personal choice in that weather. I think...
March 6, 2009 at 2:18 pm
I don't think you can move the file from the tape to disk. I could be wrong here.
The RESTORE WITH HEADERONLY should return results, no overwriting things.
Honestly, a USB drive...
March 6, 2009 at 10:22 am
you could automate this. I'd create a new table to store the data you need (or tables) and include a datetime field in this table as well. Do this in...
March 6, 2009 at 10:19 am
Jeff handled that well and got a nice reason.
March 6, 2009 at 10:14 am
No issues. These get cancelled. You could even restart the server and you'd be OK as if you never ran it.
March 6, 2009 at 10:14 am
Adi is correct, it's valid in 2000. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa259185(SQL.80).aspx
Can you post the code you're using?
Also, double check the instance you are on is SQL 2000. Select @@version. And look at the...
March 6, 2009 at 10:10 am
No, the release on 2010 is slated for 2010 1H, or first half (Q1 or Q2).
2011 is the guess for SQL 11 (SQL server 2008 is SQL v10)
March 6, 2009 at 10:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 24,886 through 24,900 (of 39,810 total)