Viewing 15 posts - 19,246 through 19,260 (of 39,903 total)
It is an interesting idea. Perhaps a specialized operator like this, adding in more choices for how to solve a particular set of problems is not enough of a boost...
July 8, 2010 at 2:46 pm
If you have a process now and want to automate it, you'll need to learn to program a bit. I wouldn't do this in .NET, but rather use SSIS. Some...
July 8, 2010 at 2:39 pm
I'd agree it's coming. Not sure that it is ready for SQL 11. The deep dives I saw on PDW recently were impressive, but with lots, and lots of caveats...
July 8, 2010 at 2:29 pm
I hadn't heard of load balancing in SQL 11. The PDW edition is locked down well, and I wonder if they would be able to mature/test it by SQL 11,...
July 8, 2010 at 2:11 pm
I certainly didn't. I was thinking a Dodgers/Rockies race. AZ/SD in last.
July 8, 2010 at 2:03 pm
It depends on how the update is submitted. Lots of applications use parameters and an sp_executesql call.
You might need to look at the activity from this connection before this statement.
July 8, 2010 at 1:49 pm
Rocks in a thriller a few days ago. 15 innings. Managed to win, but not gaining much ground in the NL West.
July 8, 2010 at 1:37 pm
SQL Server does have read only, concurrent access on a SAN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345392.aspx)
There is, as mentioned, no concurrent read/write access to multiple databases. Even the Parallel Data Warehouse spreads the load...
July 8, 2010 at 1:25 pm
Sorry, you also need to define what you mean by "check"? How does SQL Server know when the policy fails?
July 4, 2010 at 7:18 pm
Please put your question in the post, not the subject. It cuts off and can't be read.
July 4, 2010 at 7:18 pm
I don't know about the XML spreadsheet, but you can use the Export data wizard to export to an Excel 2003 format. You can write a query to put data...
July 4, 2010 at 5:18 pm
You have to trust your administrators. You can contract with them, bond them, have them liable for things, but ultimately you must trust them
July 4, 2010 at 5:15 pm
As mentioned it doesn't matter. Don't worry about FKs ordering when putting columns in the table.
July 4, 2010 at 5:13 pm
I would second Gail's advice
Here's an idea, be sure you read the discussion for the article as well: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stored+Procedures/67055/
July 4, 2010 at 4:17 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 19,246 through 19,260 (of 39,903 total)