Viewing 15 posts - 5,956 through 5,970 (of 7,597 total)
If you do many lookups by ManagerID, you'd likely be able to avoid messing with all this by clustering the table differently:
CREATE TABLE Employees (
ID INT...
July 10, 2014 at 3:09 pm
You should also be able to use a CROSS APPLY to a "SELECT TOP (1) ..." to get the most recent row for any given user.
July 10, 2014 at 2:51 pm
I want to be a successful DBA someday and hopefully can write sql scripts without looking or using BOL. 🙂
I've been a SQL Server DBA for 13+ years and I...
July 10, 2014 at 11:33 am
SELECT
COALESCE(t1.Account, t2.Account) AS Account,
MAX(Date) AS Date
FROM (
SELECT Account, MAX(Date) AS Date
FROM dbo.table1
...
July 10, 2014 at 11:30 am
The single biggest factor in overall query performance is getting the best clustered index on each table (hint: it's rarely an identity column). Typically you'd start with a higher...
July 9, 2014 at 10:24 am
I'm virtually certain the tables are clustered improperly. That should be fixed before you do the partitioning. It's even possible you won't need to partition if you put...
July 7, 2014 at 1:05 pm
You can, and definitely should, avoid converting cStaging.cDate if you can.
--if "cDate" is a datetime column:
--instead of this:
--WHERE (CONVERT(DATE, cStaging.cDate) BETWEEN @startdate AND @endDate) AND (CONVERT(DATE,...
July 7, 2014 at 12:40 pm
sqldriver (7/5/2014)
TheSQLGuru (7/1/2014)
create index ix_Split_1 on #Split_1 (NewParameter)
Good call on the joining to a split-built derived table and how putting that into a temp table could make things faster. ...
July 6, 2014 at 12:52 am
By far the biggest payback is in correcting clustered indexes if the wrong key column(s) were chosen for it. And that alone often allows very large numbers of other...
July 2, 2014 at 8:32 pm
I also make the doc tables "live". That is, the code that created/initialized/set up a new db should use the "documentation" table to determine whether the table is static...
July 2, 2014 at 8:30 pm
TheSQLGuru (7/2/2014)
ScottPletcher (7/2/2014)
TheSQLGuru (7/1/2014)
Very few things in SQL Server land can/will short-circuit.
I think that's over-stated. Most optimizers will short-circuit when they safely can. Presumably later versions of...
July 2, 2014 at 8:27 pm
You did review the stats SQL Server provides on index usage and missing indexes before you made your changes, right?
Edit: What indexes you think SQL will need/use and what indexes...
July 2, 2014 at 4:06 pm
TheSQLGuru (7/1/2014)
Very few things in SQL Server land can/will short-circuit.
I think that's over-stated. Most optimizers will short-circuit when they safely can. Presumably later versions of the optimizer...
July 2, 2014 at 4:03 pm
I wouldn't want to put them in a separate schema unless you really had to. Aside from hideous renaming issues (*), you might end up with what seems like...
July 2, 2014 at 3:43 pm
If you want to keep/commit previous activities in the loop, you likely need to explicitly BEGIN and COMMIT a tran for each loop, something like this:
WHILE ...
BEGIN
...
July 2, 2014 at 3:35 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,956 through 5,970 (of 7,597 total)