Viewing 15 posts - 5,941 through 5,955 (of 7,608 total)
You could go the redo route if you could afford some brief downtime. Stop replication, delete the data and rebuild indexes, then re-initialize the replication with a fresh snapshot.
July 17, 2014 at 9:08 am
Quite right: if DFUR1.[AsOfDate] is any date/datetime type, you don't want to use ISDATE() on it.
Also, you can simplify the year and month comparisons:
AND
YEAR(MD1.[Inception Date])...
July 16, 2014 at 5:09 pm
What percentage of the data does the part to be deleted represent? For example, if the database has 100 years of history, then 2 years is a relative pittance....
July 16, 2014 at 5:00 pm
A table consisting of customers; one row for each customer, and includes that customer's type of house, car, insurance, and type of internet connection.
I think you need to step back...
July 16, 2014 at 4:53 pm
And I realize that an absolute rule is not the intent of what you're doing, but that is what very often happens now. Identity keys have become so much...
July 16, 2014 at 11:12 am
But that's the problem that is over-looked in the all-out desire to achieve a "small clustering key". Often the "always a small clustering key" approach requires creating far more...
July 16, 2014 at 11:08 am
I think that Query1 data got scrambled or something.
Can you use a spreadsheet instead? After you run the queries, in the Results/Output area, left-click in the empty box...
July 16, 2014 at 10:17 am
The Dixie Flatline (7/15/2014)
Statement of fact: No single clustered index can ideally serve the needs of multiple queries searching against different columns of the table.
Another statement of fact:...
July 16, 2014 at 8:29 am
The Dixie Flatline (7/15/2014)
July 15, 2014 at 3:21 pm
You don't need to explicitly convert it. Just get the format to a string of YYYYMMDD, which is always a valid date/datetime format:
SELECT DATEADD(HOUR, @hour, CAST(@date AS varchar(8)))
July 15, 2014 at 1:48 pm
Here's a few thoughts:
If T270.C18133 might often be less than 19 bytes, add this to the WHERE clause:
WHERE
LEN(T270.C18133) >= 19
Since you don't have an ending %,...
July 15, 2014 at 12:57 pm
Interesting, but not definitive.
Would you please run these commands on that database and post the results? That will show what indexes SQL "thinks" are missing, and how existing indexes...
July 15, 2014 at 10:42 am
It will cover that specific process as it exists now, yes, but you're doubling one table's size. And you'll have to periodically go back and re-do the "covering" index...
July 15, 2014 at 10:19 am
D'OH, sorry, I left off one all-important WHERE condition, an absolute NO-NO for a DBA :-):
;WITH
cteTally10 AS (
SELECT 0 AS tally UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION...
July 14, 2014 at 2:30 pm
I strongly agree that you should substitute numeric values in place of the (very) long varchar key columns: [SubscriberID],[UserID] and [DeviceID].
But, until then, based on what you've posted, you should...
July 14, 2014 at 1:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,941 through 5,955 (of 7,608 total)