Viewing 15 posts - 55,771 through 55,785 (of 59,067 total)
2007-07-16 13:34:56.59 logon Login failed for user 'JUnitCustomer'.
2007-07-16 13:34:56.67 logon Login failed for user 'JUnitCustomer'.
2007-07-16 13:34:56.71 logon Login failed for user 'JUnitCustomer'.
2007-07-16 13:34:56.84 logon Login failed for user 'JUnitCustomer'.
2007-07-16 13:35:12.43 spid4 ResType:LockOwner Stype:'OR'...
July 17, 2007 at 7:29 am
Would appreciate two things please... since you obviously can't get my last name correct, please call me "Jeff". ![]()
Second... I asked you to post...
July 17, 2007 at 6:05 am
Heh... I jumped the gun a bit... Oleg's code seems to do the trick nicely, though.
July 17, 2007 at 5:59 am
Do NOT use ISQL!!! It is severely deprecated compared to OSQL. I'm not even sure why they left the bloody program available. And, don't confuse ISQL with ISQLW which is...
July 17, 2007 at 4:43 am
P.S. And, you don't need to see the KEY in this case... the report not only tells you which proc is doing it... it also tells you the line numbers...
July 17, 2007 at 4:39 am
Isolation levels may help, but the real problem is going to be in the code. If you have explicit transactions that look like the following, you may want to consider...
July 17, 2007 at 4:37 am
OK, Molly... I just gotta ask... you mean to tell me that you tried a command, that you got from somebody, on a production system without looking it up in Books Online?...
July 16, 2007 at 6:16 pm
DECLARE @MyRows INT
SELECT TOP 1 SampleUnit_ID FROM #Sps
SET @MyRows = @@ROWCOUNT
IF @MyRows...
July 16, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Heh... I don't know where they came up with the idea that SELECT INTO is slow... especially if the target DB has no triggers or keys and especially when the...
July 16, 2007 at 5:43 pm
I'm thinking you need to post the SP_Generate_Inserts proc... let us see what we can do to make it less RBAR dependent... ![]()
July 16, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 55,771 through 55,785 (of 59,067 total)