Viewing 15 posts - 55,786 through 55,800 (of 59,098 total)
Michael,
Why don't you write an article here on SQLServerCentral about you number and date range generator functions? I've always been really impressed with the speed of the darned things...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 5:22 pm
Oh, yeah... if you want the actual "Region ID", you'll need to get Telcordia's "NNACL"... but I think that's only for the US and Canada. Prepare to pay some $$...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 3:41 pm
I'll second that on LincMad... been using his stuff for years and is one of the best places to find this type of free info.
If you need something to pay...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 3:38 pm
Heh... also hacked one for Peter's method... slowed it down just a bit but it's still faster than the traditional method...
--===== Peter's method of generating random numbers from...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 3:26 pm
Hacked a fix for the zero distribution problem on the traditional method...
--===== Traditional method of generating random numbers from -5 to +5
SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN r = -5...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 3:16 pm
Couldn't resist... simple integer rounding gives zero twice the number of hits using both methods... everything else has a pretty good distirubtion... if anyone wants to take a crack at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 3:03 pm
Peter, I gotta say it again... nice job... I was a bit concerned about distribution of the numbers so I compared your method against the traditional method... both have the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 2:52 pm
Heh... no problem James... short naps are what get me through the day ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 2:29 pm
Percent James... he needs the /100 to turn it into the decimal equivelent of percent so it can be used as a multiplier...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 2:12 pm
Close Peter... and nicely done, but I believe you need this instead...
SELECT 1 + (CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 6) / 100.0
...yours gave a range of .96 to 1.04... above gives range of .95...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Heh... look at the original post... no need to put these in startup (although that's a good idea!).
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 11:08 am
No, no... just add SET NOCOUNT ON...
osql -E -d pubs -q "SET NOCOUNT ON select * from dbo.authors" >junk.txt -h-1
You could also do it in a file using the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 11:07 am
To further the explantion...
You cannot put indexes on views unless they are specifically designed to be "Indexed Views". There's a long list of requirements to make an Indexed View in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 9:34 am
And, yes... BCP will also create output without headers.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 9:28 am
As Christoper suggests, you may want to create the report (in T-SQL, possible as a sproc) and have OSQL run it... to suppress the headers, use the -h-1 parameter in the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2007 at 9:26 am
Viewing 15 posts - 55,786 through 55,800 (of 59,098 total)