Viewing 15 posts - 55,786 through 55,800 (of 59,078 total)
Do NOT use ISQL!!! It is severely deprecated compared to OSQL. I'm not even sure why they left the bloody program available. And, don't confuse ISQL with ISQLW which is...
July 17, 2007 at 4:43 am
P.S. And, you don't need to see the KEY in this case... the report not only tells you which proc is doing it... it also tells you the line numbers...
July 17, 2007 at 4:39 am
Isolation levels may help, but the real problem is going to be in the code. If you have explicit transactions that look like the following, you may want to consider...
July 17, 2007 at 4:37 am
OK, Molly... I just gotta ask... you mean to tell me that you tried a command, that you got from somebody, on a production system without looking it up in Books Online?...
July 16, 2007 at 6:16 pm
DECLARE @MyRows INT
SELECT TOP 1 SampleUnit_ID FROM #Sps
SET @MyRows = @@ROWCOUNT
IF @MyRows...
July 16, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Heh... I don't know where they came up with the idea that SELECT INTO is slow... especially if the target DB has no triggers or keys and especially when the...
July 16, 2007 at 5:43 pm
I'm thinking you need to post the SP_Generate_Inserts proc... let us see what we can do to make it less RBAR dependent... ![]()
July 16, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Heh... not according to BOL which states (no sign of PATH anywhere)...
The basic syntax for specifying the XML mode in the FOR clause...
July 16, 2007 at 5:23 pm
Surya,
Notice the following lines...
BULK INSERT dbname.dbowner.tablename
FROM '\\machinename\path\Sample.csv'
Did you make the appropriate substitutions for the lower case items? ![]()
July 16, 2007 at 5:20 pm
You bet... let us know if you need anything else...
July 16, 2007 at 5:59 am
I think the "hard part" isn't coming up with the fine code you guys already did, Brandi... the bugger is coming up with all future dates and times for a...
July 16, 2007 at 5:58 am
Viewing 15 posts - 55,786 through 55,800 (of 59,078 total)