Viewing 15 posts - 52,741 through 52,755 (of 59,072 total)
Very cool... with your great instructions, I'll just bet I learn something new! Thanks, Adrian...
I'll bet the OP will like it, as well!
I'll still take a brute force...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 7:11 am
And, I haven't done the comparison lately, but I believe the first method I showed will be the pants off most outer join methods...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 7:06 am
Absolutely agree... if the numbers table is large enough... if it's not, then you can do something like the following...
... Also, in 2k5, you really don't need a recursive CTE...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 7:04 am
Thanks for the feedback, Phil. Really appreciate your comments.
By the way (almost forgot)... they haven't fixed the code windows on this forum, yet. If you just copy and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 6:51 am
Holtis,
That's a good question... what is the 1/1/1/20008 notation? Is it real or just a cut and paste error?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 6:45 am
Certainly not... but I don't use DTS or SSIS for several reasons... wanna give it a try for us? Because I don't use it, I wouldn't know where to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 6:23 am
Nice.... just be a bit careful... haven't tested it but it looks like if the serial numbers are large, that'll take a while to resolve.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 6:09 am
Yes... not only is it possible, but it's a frequent recommendation... just change the SET ROWCOUNT value to what you want in the code that follows... note that this is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:50 am
Wow... that's pretty rude... I just found your other 10 cross posts that you posted every 30 to 60 minutes.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:38 am
This is a cross post...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic445746-145-1.aspx#bm446281
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:33 am
Those symptoms seem to match the symptoms in the KB article that VYas mentioned. Did you read the article?
We need to know what the current service pack...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:29 am
Ok... thanks for the feedback, Lester.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:22 am
Ok, thanks for the info. I'll see what I can do tonight after work.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:21 am
Would you share your solution, please?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2008 at 5:18 am
James,
Are you expecting the TestID to repeat, starting at 1, for each HeaderID in the test table?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2008 at 10:21 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 52,741 through 52,755 (of 59,072 total)