Viewing 15 posts - 52,576 through 52,590 (of 59,091 total)
Sorry guys... didn't mean any offense... today's cold medicine still hasn't worn off and it came out all wrong 😛
I guess what I really wanna know from Stricknyn, is are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Chris,
Good one... Keep in mind that would be good for one row at a time (Rand is not random in a single query) and if the digit "0" were allowed......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 11:55 am
About this time, I'm thinking we stop fighting city hall on formats and let something else do the formatting for us... and much nicer than we can make in raw...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 11:25 am
Heh... I know how to solve all of this... put all data into a single Name/Value table... primary key will also be all foreign keys and covering indexes :P:):D:hehe:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 11:22 am
Lowry Kozlowski (2/13/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 11:09 am
Cool... thanks for the feedback, Ian.
The way the standards were created is kind of interesting... after a year at my current company, I saw enough crap and ran...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 10:54 am
Matt... is that going to work in 2k?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 10:32 am
Grant Fritchey (2/13/2008)
Doesn't the fact that floats are imprecise estimates represent a pretty major possible problem in using them in financial calculations? At least that's what I've always been told....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2008 at 10:28 am
Ian Crandell (1/9/2008)
Jeff Moden (1/8/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Heh... one of the many reasons I don't use DTS...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 9:48 pm
I've used Money... I've used SmallMoney... I've even used Decimal... and they all failed the accuracy test when it came to things like mortgage calculations.
If all you're ever going to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Yes... it does make a difference... about 21% without an order by and about 12% with an order by. But wait...
Heh... on a million rows of data with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 9:18 pm
Nuts (2/12/2008)
That exactly what I wanted
Just curious... which way did you end up going exactly?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 8:38 pm
stricknyn (2/12/2008)
Seems like this should be pretty straight forward, but its not working. I'm trying to build a string with 7 characters from a random statement:
Declare @mn int
Declare @mx...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 8:36 pm
I'm confused... I believe the cross-join is to generate a million rows... not to generate the 7 digits. Perhaps I was looking at the wrong post. Which one...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 52,576 through 52,590 (of 59,091 total)