Viewing 15 posts - 52,111 through 52,125 (of 59,091 total)
O jeez... I totally missed that... yes, that would be the problem. Nice job, Gus.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Thanks, Matt. Guess I won't be buying that for my home machine in the very near future... 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Sometimes, I feel pretty stupid... I'm still coming up to speed on 2005 (installed at home in December)... what in the Dickens is "TFS"?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 1:30 pm
You got that right...
By the way... thanks for taking that the right way. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 1:20 pm
CTE... Derivied table... no difference in performance, memory usage, of disk hits on TempDB... they both equate to "inline views"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 1:19 pm
That's certainly another way to do it.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 1:08 pm
You have the correct idea... but since you didn't post anything about what the "user_splits" table looks like or what data it has in it, I have no idea what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Wel-l-l-l-l-l.... kind of...
Sys.Objects has a Modify_Date column on it so you can tell when the last change occurred... you just can tell what the change was.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:47 pm
No, no... the TIMESTAMP datatype has absolutely NOTHING to do with a date or a time. Despite what Sam offered up, the best you'll get is some date and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Grant Fritchey (3/5/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Ok... thanks for the feedback...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:23 pm
Please post the actual query... there's no way the one you posted actually works.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:18 pm
It's certainly not automatic, but my first inclination is to ask...
1. You allow folks to change production stored procedures without DBA approval?
2. Are there no documentation standards? ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Ok... since you can't actually see Ascii 26 except maybe as a supurious square, how can you tell the end of file marker is being loaded?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Thanks TonyJ, It works but it doesn't work when u have this scenario
And, still, you haven't tried the solution that Ian posted which doesn't have that problem... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2008 at 11:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 52,111 through 52,125 (of 59,091 total)