Viewing 15 posts - 51,706 through 51,720 (of 59,072 total)
There's a back door that works in 2000, but the same method fails a permissions test in 2k5. Haven't found a way around it yet...
Funny how things are... I...
March 17, 2008 at 6:54 am
Balmukund Lakhani (3/17/2008)
I would repeat your answer "NO" 😀
Thanks... I was hoping that maybe I missed a trick... I'm fairly new to 2k5 and don't yet know all the "secrets"....
March 17, 2008 at 6:40 am
Yeah... I was thinking about the sp_ thing... maybe use it to create a temp table and use it as if it were a view.
March 17, 2008 at 6:35 am
Alright... sorry... thought the million rows was the whole table.
You need to build an update crawler for this, especially if the table is an "online" table being accessed by others....
March 17, 2008 at 6:33 am
Balmukund Lakhani (3/17/2008)
SQL Server 2008 would have this feature out-of-the-box.its called Change data capture (CDC)
That's nice... got anything for 2005?
March 17, 2008 at 12:23 am
Temp tables and table variables both start out in memory and spill over to disk if they get large enough.
There's a whole lot of minor differences but the big difference...
March 17, 2008 at 12:20 am
Correct in some areas, Thomas... you can try the code I posted to verify...
The source data is queried once for each correlated subquery meaning that, with the correct index, 3...
March 16, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Thanks, Matt... that'll teach me... I normally do a lot more research and "due diligence" before I post an article. I got in a hurry this time and didn't...
March 16, 2008 at 11:34 pm
Ack... sorry Barry... the darned thing doesn't work in 2k5... gives a permissions error. I'm trying to find a back door but it doesn't look promising yet.
March 16, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Tim Mitchell (3/16/2008)
Take them to lunch...
That's step 1 in the porkchop reference 😉
March 16, 2008 at 11:07 pm
peer_mohamed2k (3/14/2008)
I have 1,65,00,000 rows [16 million rows] in one table. I am using this table for SQL reports. When I use this table joining with some other tables, my...
March 16, 2008 at 9:46 pm
The short answer is NO and sys.tables won't tell you a thing about this.
March 16, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Heh... all good methods but they left a really good one out... it's really old fashioned but it works really well... look at the drive... if the little red light...
March 16, 2008 at 9:40 pm
Yep... also try sp_helpdb. Not as robust but will tell you the overall size. And thanks for posting even though you found your own answer.
March 16, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 51,706 through 51,720 (of 59,072 total)