Viewing 15 posts - 51,691 through 51,705 (of 59,091 total)
To me, CTE's have the advantage of Derived Tables because you can reference them many times in the same query at different levels in the query whereas a Derived table...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 8:24 am
Gosh... ya gotta wonder, though... seems like the VarDecimal datatype option has a pretty limited application... you'd think they'd have spent more time on something important like getting SUM() OVER()...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 8:08 am
Sorry Gus... I actually didn't mean it that way (better)... I just meant it's different and you don't need the CTE if you don't want it. They both run...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 8:03 am
Matt Miller (3/18/2008)
I just came across this -
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/mladenp/archive/2006/11/10/19546.aspx
It does seem...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 7:48 am
Heh... well I'll be... I found it...
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb326653.aspx
... learn something new every day...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 7:38 am
VARDECIMAL OPTION? Where did you find that? I can't even find it in Books Online... Is it a database setting or ???
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 7:35 am
Sounds like another "Sr. Project".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 6:48 am
Doing my morning article "skimming" and saw this one. In the "Conclusion" it's stated "This way I avoid using a GROUP BY "... and the example right above it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 6:41 am
Which one of the many links posted is that? And why does he say not to use Bulk Insert/BCP anymore?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 6:29 am
Whatever... I just think this is wrong on so many levels.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 6:22 am
rbarryyoung (3/15/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 6:05 am
Anirban Paul (3/18/2008)
Thanks...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 18, 2008 at 5:38 am
FULL OUTER JOIN with null detectors on both tables.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 17, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Don't store formatting symbols in the database. The only thing they're good for is display... you'd have to strip them out of most file transfers and reporting and GUI...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 17, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Thanks for posting the solution, Virgil...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 17, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 51,691 through 51,705 (of 59,091 total)