Viewing 15 posts - 51,301 through 51,315 (of 59,072 total)
BULK INSERT is absolutely the fastest... but I don't believe that it supports importing Excel Spreadsheets.
Even if it did, if someone has the spreadsheet open, SQL Server will not...
April 1, 2008 at 10:12 pm
Antonio...
When you say ".RDL", are you talking about a "CLR"?
April 1, 2008 at 10:11 pm
This is actually very similar to the classic "paging problem"... I'll see if I can whip up an example tomorrow (today actually... it's after midnight here) ...
April 1, 2008 at 10:08 pm
lalonacademy,
I'm not sure how you got the data into the table, but consider this... BULK INSERT with a format file to handle your strange delimiters will load 5.1 MILLION 20...
April 1, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Ok... here's my entry for the virtual beer...
1 million rows... half are the first row and half are the second row that the Op posted. My goal was to...
April 1, 2008 at 9:56 pm
Thanks guys... I knew it had to be something simple :blush:
April 1, 2008 at 9:20 pm
antonio.collins (4/1/2008)
sounds like a challenge to me! winner buys a round of beer for everyone?
Sure, I'm good for a virtual beer and pretzels... Million rows ok with you? 🙂
April 1, 2008 at 7:37 pm
lalonacademy (4/1/2008)
I have a text (words separated by the symbol '&' (symbol ampersand). I need...
April 1, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Heh... I love it... someone gave me the ultra low mark of 1 star and didn't even have the nerve to tell me why.
Would it help if I told you...
April 1, 2008 at 7:26 pm
Thanks, Antonio...
While I agree that the XML concatenation method is very fast, I've found that the XLM parsing method is a bit slow compared to a Tally Table or cteTally...
April 1, 2008 at 6:59 pm
Just checking to be sure... do all the rows have exactly the same number of "fields" and all the rows are always in the same basic format?
April 1, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Gosh, I hate the idea of replacing one form of recursion with another, but the recursive CTE will at least handle a set even if it is hidden RBAR.
April 1, 2008 at 4:50 pm
GSquared (4/1/2008)
April 1, 2008 at 4:44 pm
Heh... you can tell I've watched way too many info-mercials! 😛
April 1, 2008 at 4:29 pm
Harveysburger (4/1/2008)
Would this affect anyone's conclusion on the design?
No... disparate transaction types should live in their own tables. Rules of normalization such as no duplicates and no nulls should...
April 1, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 51,301 through 51,315 (of 59,072 total)