Viewing 15 posts - 51,256 through 51,270 (of 59,072 total)
Not sure what you're after... didn't you just use a single command?
April 4, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Um.... SQL Server 2000 doesn't have the full compliment of RegEx operators, so I'm pretty sure that won't work.
April 4, 2008 at 8:29 pm
jastarling (4/4/2008)
Based on that, I changed the...
April 4, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Guess I'm the oddity...
I say "S-Q-L" Server because my original SQL Mentor would smack me in the head if I said "SeQueL".
I also say "Column", not "Field".
I also say...
April 4, 2008 at 4:12 pm
I see that the not so uncommon thing has occurred... Matt beat me to it 😀
April 4, 2008 at 7:08 am
In the at the very top of the "left window" for each post (just above where you got my posting stats from), just click on my bolded name... new menu...
April 4, 2008 at 7:05 am
Matt Miller (4/4/2008)
ALZDBA (4/3/2008)
Matt Miller (4/3/2008)
...By the way - the relevant reply seems to be on page 17....
(that was a dirty trick there, Johan!)
...
Dynamic paging ... :Whistling:
In my SSC-forum-profile...
April 4, 2008 at 6:57 am
I haven't checked the entire BCP format file, but the delimiters for the first 4 columns are good...
The problem is with the 3rd column of the HEADER (not the...
April 4, 2008 at 6:18 am
J (4/3/2008)
What I' was a little bit worried about is that the myTempSelectionList table would appear to become a hot spot and possibly a source of deadlocks unless you're very...
April 3, 2008 at 8:55 pm
You say it isn't working at all... do you get any kind of an error message?
April 3, 2008 at 8:49 pm
More on the above... try solving the running total problem in 3 or 4 different RDBMS engines... and still have some scalability and performance left over.
April 3, 2008 at 8:19 am
Portability? Have you ever tried to make 100% portable code and still have it actually do something more than return data to a GUI with simple SELECTs? Even...
April 3, 2008 at 8:18 am
I agree... like I said, not sure why I even posted the implicit code... I don't trust defaults for the same reasons you don't.
April 3, 2008 at 7:56 am
Very good point.
Actually, I'm not even sure why I posted the implicit conversion code... Implicit conversions constitute a "default" of sorts and I've seen MS change a couple of defaults...
April 3, 2008 at 5:57 am
Viewing 15 posts - 51,256 through 51,270 (of 59,072 total)