Viewing 15 posts - 50,116 through 50,130 (of 59,102 total)
SQL Server 2005 allows you to write PIVOT queries. Lookup the keyword PIVOT in Books Online. Books Online comes free with SQL Server and is the "help" system...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:34 am
Not likely the database did it... either a human or some other program did it. Finding out what changed it will take some doing, though.
Should never grow by percent,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:32 am
One of the cylinders on my car is misfiring... I can't understand why the mechanic blew me off when I told him he couldn't look under the hood because I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:29 am
I'd say that's a pretty tall order unless you have a particular domain in mind that want's particular formatting rules. Then, you could use LIKE to build a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:23 am
Here's a "cheater" method...
count(*)*1.0/(DATEDIFF(s, MIN(scan_datetime), MAX(scan_datetime))) as ItemsPerSecond
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:12 am
Ok... now that everyone has figured stuff out... how 'bout everyone post their solutions? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:07 am
I found it... them, really.
http://www.sqlmag.com/Articles/ArticleID/19851/19851/pg/2/2.html?Ad=1
http://www.sqlmag.com/Article/ArticleID/20242/sql_server_20242.html
I'm not a "member" of that particular site so I can't see the whole article. What I glean from the two articles is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 6:54 am
AndyD (6/12/2008)
Jeff Moden (6/12/2008)
I remember seeing an article on the difference between 0% and 100% fill factors... Dunno if I can find it, again, but I'll look...
I was only regurgitating...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 6:43 am
AndyD (6/12/2008)
Just one quick question - you mention the Fill Factor defaults to 100% in 2005, whereas it was 90% in 2000. [To be precise,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 6:26 am
Nice, clear, well written article with good advice. Thanks!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Dominique DUCHEMIN (6/11/2008)
To defrag is it always a manual process for safety reason or other or could we automate the process?
Sure... create a scheduled job... you can use SQL Server...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 9:05 pm
... and that's why I hate multiple-guess questions... gimme a good solid essay question or lemme write some code, instead!
That was a fun conversation to watch... thanks, Gents. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 8:58 pm
Heh... and Marketing.
Nice explanation, Barry!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 11:53 am
rbarryyoung (6/11/2008)
Seriously though, "useful" and "appropiate" were not part of your specs. 🙂 They're a lot harder to fulfill. (Though as Lynn says,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 11:48 am
Matt Miller (6/11/2008)
Jeff Moden (6/11/2008)
rbarryyoung (6/11/2008)
Well, if we're looking for examples, a Fourier Transform would proabably be a good candidate for CLR.
Heh... ok, I gotta ask... has anyone actually ever...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 11:43 am
Viewing 15 posts - 50,116 through 50,130 (of 59,102 total)