Viewing 15 posts - 50,101 through 50,115 (of 59,091 total)
I'm thinking that your connection string had better be connecting you to some database other than the one you're detaching.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 8:20 am
These are some fairly broad questions that would probably be best answered by looking up things like "working with cubes in SQL Server" or "using olap" or somesuch in Books...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 8:14 am
Might have to setup something like a web service to run on an intra net... lot's of folks do such a thing... Talk to anyone who writes ASP.Net or...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 8:04 am
There are very few reasons why this may happen...
--Uncommitted transaction
Do a transaction count at the end of the proc to find out. Might take a bit to find if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 8:00 am
SQL Server 2005 allows you to write PIVOT queries. Lookup the keyword PIVOT in Books Online. Books Online comes free with SQL Server and is the "help" system...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:34 am
Not likely the database did it... either a human or some other program did it. Finding out what changed it will take some doing, though.
Should never grow by percent,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:32 am
One of the cylinders on my car is misfiring... I can't understand why the mechanic blew me off when I told him he couldn't look under the hood because I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:29 am
I'd say that's a pretty tall order unless you have a particular domain in mind that want's particular formatting rules. Then, you could use LIKE to build a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:23 am
Here's a "cheater" method...
count(*)*1.0/(DATEDIFF(s, MIN(scan_datetime), MAX(scan_datetime))) as ItemsPerSecond
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:12 am
Ok... now that everyone has figured stuff out... how 'bout everyone post their solutions? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 7:07 am
I found it... them, really.
http://www.sqlmag.com/Articles/ArticleID/19851/19851/pg/2/2.html?Ad=1
http://www.sqlmag.com/Article/ArticleID/20242/sql_server_20242.html
I'm not a "member" of that particular site so I can't see the whole article. What I glean from the two articles is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 6:54 am
AndyD (6/12/2008)
Jeff Moden (6/12/2008)
I remember seeing an article on the difference between 0% and 100% fill factors... Dunno if I can find it, again, but I'll look...
I was only regurgitating...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 6:43 am
AndyD (6/12/2008)
Just one quick question - you mention the Fill Factor defaults to 100% in 2005, whereas it was 90% in 2000. [To be precise,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2008 at 6:26 am
Nice, clear, well written article with good advice. Thanks!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Dominique DUCHEMIN (6/11/2008)
To defrag is it always a manual process for safety reason or other or could we automate the process?
Sure... create a scheduled job... you can use SQL Server...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 11, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,101 through 50,115 (of 59,091 total)