Viewing 15 posts - 49,021 through 49,035 (of 59,093 total)
Vampire (7/31/2008)
Sql Server doesn't allow us to capture the rows returned by a Sproc since Sprocs dont have ability to return a result set.
Absolutely not true in SQL Server... ;)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 6:57 pm
I have no idea how to troubleshoot, never mind even write a CLR. But, I am interested in what your UDF does... if you don't mind.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Yeaup! I agree with Sergiy... The file should only contain delimited data and then use either BCP or BULK INSERT to import the data. See Books Online for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 6:28 pm
What a great set of "mini-courses" you're in the process of having published! Nicely done!
My only question on this one would be... why would you ever teach anyone to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 6:21 pm
Heh... of course it's a perfect solution... but only for what it was designed for... it's an IsAllDigits function and wasn't meant to be anything else. If you want...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (7/31/2008)
You should get clarification from MS. They can be funny about this.
My understanding is you can use Dev for yourself, but everyone else needs a CAL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 9:10 am
Thanks for the clarifications, folks... between what has already been posted and what I found at the links included in the following, it turns out that you can have as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 9:08 am
Outstanding, Ian... that's just what I was looking for. Thanks for the very quick reply, too!:)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 8:44 am
kubilay husmenoglu (7/31/2008)
Hi, I have exactly the same problem with OSQL.Does anybody has a solution
I'd recommend you start a new thread for this... it'll get more attention.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 4:58 am
Ross McMicken (7/31/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2008 at 4:54 am
Oh, yeah... almost forgot... "In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King!"... That's why most people look at the Execution Plan and believe in it. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2008 at 9:32 pm
I may have to write an article about it someday... I've found that WHERE NOT IN beats the OUTER JOIN type of exclusion, WHERE NOT EXISTS correlated subqueries, and a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Heh... reminds me of a dictionary... how can you check the spelling on a word using a dictionary without a bit of luck?
I agree with Matt... UNPIVOT is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Matt Miller (7/30/2008)
Jeff Moden (7/30/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2008 at 8:41 pm
usman.tanveer (7/30/2008)
Can using (Nolock) or (ReadPass) help gaining performance benefits for select queries?
In my point of view may be we could......like in my scenario......db is accessed by multiple...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2008 at 8:21 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 49,021 through 49,035 (of 59,093 total)