Viewing 15 posts - 48,436 through 48,450 (of 59,102 total)
Hey guys... I put some bum dope out about the clustered index method and I've edited out the post I made about it. My fault, I didn't test well...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 6, 2008 at 9:58 am
timothyawiseman (9/5/2008)
I do understand why...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 6, 2008 at 9:29 am
Sorry... I put some bum dope out :blush: and deleted this entry.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 6, 2008 at 8:11 am
Sorry... I overlooked the part about the "client's hosted app"... does that mean it's a 3rd party app that the client cannot change?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Hiearchy can be a good thing... but I don't believe the op can change the structure of the tables. 😉
CS... Please pardon me if I'm wrong, but this looks...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Phil Factor (9/25/2007)
Jeff Moden (9/25/2007)
Phil's method only works if the ID is contiguous and sequential.
Er.. The temporary table had an identity column in there that was intended to ensure precisely...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 7:17 pm
spiegdon (10/15/2007)
We ended up going with the cursor approach as all we are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 7:09 pm
Thanks, Pam... I appreciate your feedback. And, cool Avatar! Welcome to SQLServerCentral.com! 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Spot on, Gus. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:51 pm
rohanverma (9/3/2008)
Thank you for the above script, I used the above script and it worked just fine. My question is for the part:
--===== Query one of the files by using...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:34 pm
I mean C:\temp on the SQL Server that's doing the reading.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:30 pm
dsegalles80 (9/5/2008)
I gotta ask... why do you need to do this? What is the purpose of this?
This is used for update by batch as per requirement on our...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:25 pm
jfbergeron (9/4/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:12 pm
You still haven't answered the question though... why would anyone create such a table of 1 gig of almost nothing but NEWID()'s?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:08 pm
Two way street here... 😉 What did you finally do to fix it?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 5, 2008 at 6:06 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 48,436 through 48,450 (of 59,102 total)