Viewing 15 posts - 47,086 through 47,100 (of 59,101 total)
Heh... dang it... I gotta remember... "Scroll Down". You have that in the code. :blush:
I'm running some tests on this (cuz it's interesting)... I'll give a complete report when...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 22, 2008 at 9:17 am
Sounds like a lot of fun... thanks for the feedback. Did you index the numbers table with a clustered PK by any chance?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 7:24 pm
mstjean (11/21/2008)
I just found this article and cannot wait to run some tests and eventually try it out in prod. I've only read the first page of comments, so no...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 7:14 pm
Jeff Moden (1/31/2008)
James Goodwin (1/31/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Christopher Ford (5/11/2008)
Anirban Paul (5/11/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 5:48 pm
I'm of the same ilk... 🙂
Lemme know what you think when you've had a chance to run the code. Thanks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 5:31 pm
Heh... yeah... "Please Help"... I especially love the one's that have the word "URGENT!" in the title. Those are always "fun" in one form or another. Then, there's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Like I said... you got lucky. There have been dozens of posts where folks want to go back to 2k because 2k5 made the app slower.
Very glad it worked...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 5:00 pm
Heh... then there are the folks that believe those datatypes are nothing more than a form of formatting that should really be done in the GUI. I'm one of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 5:19 am
sandeephughes (11/21/2008)
Thanks for everybody's reply for confirming that SQL Server 2005 has much better performance improvement than SQL Server 2000.
Nah... that's just not true. It may be true for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 21, 2008 at 5:14 am
Damned smiley faces... see attached, please...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 20, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Well, kinda... 😉 It doesn't use xp_CmdShell, but it does (I'm a bit embarrassed but couldn't be helped with sp_OA* in SQL Server 2000, that I know of) use...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 20, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Heh... yeah... I don't even look for the word CURSOR, anymore... they need a WHILE loop to really do anything and, since both are RBAR, I just look for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 20, 2008 at 9:09 pm
Run the code... what do you think from running the code?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 20, 2008 at 9:04 pm
karthikeyan (11/20/2008)
...and send the reports to the business users...
Not quite what I was looking for... What type of report are you sending to the business users where you have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 20, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 47,086 through 47,100 (of 59,101 total)