Viewing 15 posts - 46,951 through 46,965 (of 59,064 total)
jacroberts (11/27/2008)
Here's my example:
We had a table of...
November 27, 2008 at 8:25 pm
For the most part, Yes. On concatenation of such a small number of parts, not really.
November 27, 2008 at 4:47 pm
Very cool code, Chris... your' guy's efforts made me finish up what I started and it looks nothing like the original code I posted... I couldn't stand the fact that...
November 27, 2008 at 4:37 pm
Chris Morris (11/27/2008)
Jeff Moden (11/27/2008)
Chris Morris (11/27/2008)
November 27, 2008 at 3:04 pm
Chris Morris (11/27/2008)
Here's a 2k/2k5-friendly version with a permanent lookup table. It translates 30,000 numbers from a standard tally table, in both SQL Server versions, in about 4 seconds.
Ummm......
November 27, 2008 at 11:35 am
Lynn Pettis (11/27/2008)
And two, someone is going to come along and see your code in your RBAR TVF and use it somewhere else and it won't be effecient at all.
Heh......
November 27, 2008 at 11:10 am
Lynn Pettis (11/26/2008)
Good article, but let's take another approach and see what we see.
Heh... you beat me to it, again. 😉
November 27, 2008 at 11:02 am
Hugo Kornelis (11/27/2008)
November 27, 2008 at 11:00 am
Peso (11/27/2008)
The query returns 290 columns and joins 62 tables. Under these cirumstances I think 7 seconds is quite good.
Ditto.
November 27, 2008 at 10:30 am
Mannie, thanks for posting the article... your points are well taken and the appearance of the article is actually very timely for me. It gave me a chance to...
November 27, 2008 at 10:27 am
David Burrows (11/27/2008)
And Jeff makes a good point too. Not enough of you guys get credit for posting knowledge...
Hear, hear. 🙂
But I think we all owe thanks to folks...
November 27, 2008 at 10:20 am
thisisfutile (11/25/2008)
Jeff Moden (11/25/2008)
Heh... then there's the "intelligent" ones that say things like "performance" doesn't matter and will argue for hours about it. The only reason why I continue...
November 27, 2008 at 10:17 am
G Bryant McClellan (11/25/2008)
And Jeff makes a good point too....
November 27, 2008 at 9:49 am
Matt Miller (11/26/2008)
November 26, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Yep... try getting the TOP 10 random rows from a big table that way... hell to pay for performance. Be careful how you use it for that reason.
November 26, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46,951 through 46,965 (of 59,064 total)