Viewing 15 posts - 46,951 through 46,965 (of 59,101 total)
Dang... I missed that... was looking at the wrong column for "dupes".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 5:53 pm
CrazyMan (11/28/2008)
CREATE VIEW VTEST AS
SELECT A,B FROM TABLE1
UNION
SELECT A,B FROM TABLE2
This view cant do update :D, it is read only 🙂
Ummm... not if it's a partitioned view which IS...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 5:22 pm
homebrew01 (11/28/2008)
However, if I replace @list_Id with an actual value, then it shows an index seek.
Trick it...
WHERE l.List_ID > 0
AND l.List_ID = @list_id
AND...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Sorry... didn't see Gail's post on 1222...
I also share her concern on setting a deadlock priority... it's like asking a Mother which baby someone can kill. The best...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:48 pm
TNV (11/26/2008)
Basically I am new to this SQL Server stuff...
I am using MSSQL Server 2005 Express. I turned on trace by using DBCC TRACEON (1024). But in the errorlog,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:46 pm
I tend to steer clear of using Table Variables... there's a whole lot of reasons for that but the biggest reason is that when in Query Analyzer or SMS for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:44 pm
Jeff Moden (11/28/2008)
Jack Corbett (11/28/2008)
If it has to be a view change the CTE to a derived table in the FROM clause.
Strangely enough, I've not tried using a CTE...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:37 pm
Jack Corbett (11/28/2008)
If it has to be a view change the CTE to a derived table in the FROM clause.
Strangely enough, I've not tried using a CTE in a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Mike C (11/28/2008)
TheSQLGuru (10/14/2008)
And I too think this is a presentation layer item. Or perhaps a CLR...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:34 pm
rbarryyoung (11/28/2008)
Heh. Now that sounds like the ancient art of Wi-Yi-Yotta.😛
You mean the one cherished by the "fugawie" tribe? :hehe:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:28 pm
jacroberts (11/28/2008)
My original actual query was a lot different and maybe I've over simplified it for want of a simple example.
I agree and the change you made seems to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Chris Morris (11/28/2008)
Jeff Moden (11/28/2008)
That's about what I would expect from an almost real set of random numbers.You mean almost reel, right? 😛
-- did you catch the dupes?
Yep... and the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Heh... that's "Mo den e'nuff outa yous". 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Oh... and I agree with both Barry and Gail as to why people took exception to both the original post and the very "pork chop" deserving replies that he made.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Owing to a response I had given once before and that I won't replay here, the word "pork chop" has become a metaphor for setting someone straight, usually with indisputable...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46,951 through 46,965 (of 59,101 total)