Viewing 15 posts - 46,936 through 46,950 (of 59,101 total)
That would be true. Some good fellow had the link to my Triangular join article with the comment that folks should take a gander. I didn't mean to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 7:48 am
Heh... Great Circle calcs to find closest... doesn't seem to be needed especially in the Temperate zone of latitudes and longitudes limited to only 1/8th the circumference of the Earth....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 7:33 am
rbarryyoung (11/28/2008)
(Hmm, maybe I should write an article on this ...) 🙂
{insert Jeapordy theme song here} 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 7:14 am
I've not seen such a thing... perhaps try using MaxDop 1 just to see if parallelism is getting to it? I'd try it on a multi-processor box if I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 6:59 am
What is it that you think you need a CLR for that can't be done in T-SQL? In other words, what is the CLR that you want to write...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 6:56 am
Madhivanan (11/29/2008)
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/madhivanan/archive/2008/07/21/ordering-interger-values-stored-in-varchar-column.aspx
Ummm... that's cool, but most of those methods don't work on alpha-numeric columns.
Chris did it right.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 6:54 am
GilaMonster (11/29/2008)
Though, if you look, most of those certs are not SQL related...
True enough... but they are suppose to imply the ability to think and do a little research on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2008 at 6:37 am
Jportelas (11/28/2008)
Seems like trying to cover all the failure scenarios is the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Heh... Read it? I wrote it! 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Dang... some of the things I forget... thanks Barry.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 7:31 pm
BWAA-HAA! And then, you double post the same question...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic610096-146-1.aspx
... you're not making a lot of friends here.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 6:41 pm
khushbu.kumar (11/28/2008)
GilaMonster (11/28/2008)
I'm not sure there's a good way in SQL 2005.Why can't you make the combination of the two columns unique?
I cant make combination as unique coz 1. abc...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 6:39 pm
tkoletsis (11/28/2008)
I think it's a very common case to import data from an excel file to sql server 2005 thru a stored procedure. There are many solutions solutions such as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 6:34 pm
BWAAA-HAAA! New candidate for the Pork Chop Award... look at the question and then look at the certs this guy boasts in his signature...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic608903-360-1.aspx
... heh... guess all those certs...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 6:30 pm
Chris, I've created a Numbers table with the same column name as you (Number), and I cannot get the code to fail the same way as you have with the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 28, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46,936 through 46,950 (of 59,101 total)