Viewing 15 posts - 45,226 through 45,240 (of 59,101 total)
Tony (2/13/2009)
I'll have to try this in similar places using functions and CTEs, and see what performs better.
I can end my week on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Just an FYI for everyone in case there's a doubt... I've recently (10 minutes ago) had reason to move TempDB on one of my 2k5 dev boxes... it worked perfectly...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2009 at 4:12 pm
sushila (2/13/2009)
Jeff Moden (9/20/2007)
Thanks John and Rog... much appreciated!
You may be using the wrong layer to do database things in. The type of activety that you've both described should probably...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2009 at 11:44 am
DURGESH (2/13/2009)
i have a string as 'a;b;cde;f;ghi;d' or 'a;b;cde;f;ghi;defg'
now i want to split the given string as 'a;b;cde;f;ghi;' or 'a;b;cde;f;ghi;'
i tried using substring,left,charindex functions but i did not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 13, 2009 at 6:22 am
I think you'll find that Michael's solution is absolutely the fastest because it uses only 1 implicit conversion and it's not character based.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2009 at 9:02 pm
Daryl (2/12/2009)
- meaning full alibi's... I always use alibis but A & B crapcodea
The term is "alias"... 😉
- do not Select INTO ____ , define the table and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Please see the article at the link in my signature below. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2009 at 8:39 pm
Grant Fritchey (2/12/2009)
GilaMonster (2/12/2009)
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost655667.aspx
I want to do a PhD in the area of database optimisers. Can anyone suggest a good topic?
Gees, it took me months of reading to decide on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 12, 2009 at 7:48 pm
This is SQL Server 2005... with that in mind, you don't need the overhead of UDF's and you sure as heck don't need a cursor or While loop for such...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 11, 2009 at 7:25 pm
Thanks for the feedback, Judy.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 11, 2009 at 5:09 pm
It seems to happen every February... company finally gets a new budget for the year, hires some folks in January, and they start asking questions in February. It's compounded...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 11, 2009 at 6:12 am
Thank you, Anirban. You're always gracious and kind with your words.
They republish this article about every two months or so to try and help folks with their...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 11, 2009 at 6:05 am
Judy, are you all set with this?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 10, 2009 at 10:57 pm
viduvs (2/10/2009)
Thanks for all the replies.Actually this is one time activity. So we don't want to pay much attention towards optimization of this stored procedure.
Like Gail said, that's probably why...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 10, 2009 at 10:54 pm
kbatta (2/9/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 10, 2009 at 7:01 am
Viewing 15 posts - 45,226 through 45,240 (of 59,101 total)