Viewing 15 posts - 45,091 through 45,105 (of 59,101 total)
Steve Jones - Editor (2/18/2009)
I'm interested to see the benchmarks. I know doing this in C would be complicated, but not tremendously...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 18, 2009 at 9:04 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (2/17/2009)
If you compare REVERSE with SUBSTRING or other string functions, how much slower...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 18, 2009 at 6:42 am
... and if you can't trust them, you probably hired the wrong person and should spend more time on personnel evals and the firing process than approving travel for someone...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Ah... another "tweek"....
WHERE EmployeeID IS NOT NULL is a bit slower than WHERE EmployeeID > 0 assuming, of course, that you have no EmployeeID's <= 0... sometimes, quite a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:33 pm
Lynn's suggested changes are a great way to start. What he failed to mention is... why. Even if you added a pot wad of indexes to the original...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:30 pm
p.s. ... and we did it without {gasp} tool tips in SQL. Yes, there are some grand improvements that could be made to SQL, but we've seen the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:17 pm
I read the last paragraph with mixed thoughts on the subject of code metrics. I started playing back in my mind what many Developers do if left to their...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 9:55 pm
4DJ**** (2/17/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 9:18 pm
Luke L (2/17/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Matt Miller (2/17/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 8:57 pm
Yeah... I went through such hell with a 3rd party POS myself. In my case, it had no archiving and, worse, it used a Sequence Table instead of IDENTITY...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 8:32 pm
Nothing free... just beginner stuff.
If you really want to "take it to the next level", I know a pretty good forum that you could start answering questions for. ;)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Bruce W Cassidy (2/17/2009)
Jeff Moden (2/17/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Bob Hovious (2/17/2009)
I send IMs to the guys in the next cube all the time... you can cut and paste code, or whatever, and not bother all the other folks...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 7:43 pm
Bob Hovious (2/17/2009)
"correlated sub-query"
Correlated sub-query?
CorrELATed sub-query?
No wonder I haven't been able to find anything !!!!!
I've been trying to search for CORRUGATED subqueries !!!! :w00t:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seriously, even reading...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 45,091 through 45,105 (of 59,101 total)