Viewing 15 posts - 45,106 through 45,120 (of 59,095 total)
GilaMonster (2/17/2009)
Jeff Moden (2/16/2009)
How much of this applies to the system's databases (not including TempDB, of course)?
MSDB can be repaired, I believe (haven't tried it). Master I would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Bruce W Cassidy (2/17/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Bruce W Cassidy (2/17/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 6:13 pm
Lynn Pettis (2/17/2009)
GilaMonster (2/17/2009)
<Sigh> Why don't people read the manuals?Thinking and Reading that would mean. On silver plater answer should be.
Heh... "STAR"... Start Thinking And Reading. Or, "RATS"......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 5:58 pm
louisevb (2/17/2009)
Hey Jeff, thanx man another great website and a freebie . . bonus!!
You bet... thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:58 am
AFCC Inc. Com (2/17/2009)
Did I post enough info to loop that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:56 am
I think so... just remember that it's NOT geared specifically to T-SQL (MS SQL Server dialect of SQL).
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 10:51 am
fergek (2/16/2009)
Additionally, instead of using subqueries, try to rewrite the sentence using CTE.
Why? Other than readability, it's not going to perform any better... it's just an inline view either...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 9:48 pm
I usually don't turn it on either... especially when I know which proc is causing the problem.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Also, keep in mind that there are different "dialects" of SQL. "Basic" SQL is called "ANSI SQL" and is supposed to be standard. The real fact of the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 8:47 pm
louisevb (2/16/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 8:43 pm
I believe that Andrew pretty much has it. The only shortcoming would be turning it into a matrix. You only need a Cross-Tab for that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 8:31 pm
Max (2/16/2009)
Not yet... but that helps some. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Alvin Ramard (2/16/2009)
Michael, did he end up on MythBusters?😀
Heh... I would think more like "MouseBusters". 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 4:33 pm
As a possible alternative...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63003/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2009 at 4:21 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 45,106 through 45,120 (of 59,095 total)