Viewing 15 posts - 43,936 through 43,950 (of 59,097 total)
I think it very ironic that people continue to find better ways to find performance problems caused by poorly written code that should never have made it to the database...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2009 at 9:24 am
Thanks for the offers of help guys. I love this team.
I've got 2k Dev, 2k5 Dev, and I'll soon have 2k8 Dev. I may also be shifting primary...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2009 at 9:09 am
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ansi+92
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ascii&aq=f&oq=
😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:55 pm
If there's another thread with more detailed information, why the hell are we trying to answer anything on this thread? We're just spitting resources here.;-)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Florian Reischl (5/2/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:39 pm
Heh... I'd recommend that you may need to actually put some data in the table before you even think of trying to optimize a query.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:37 pm
dave b (5/2/2009)
BTW...I just started reading your post about the "Tally" table.
I am now officially on a quest to eliminate my cursors and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:27 pm
Heh... it could simply be that the non-Ansi join was returning the incorrect row count to begin with. From BOL...
In earlier versions of Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000, left and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:22 pm
I agree. It would be real handy to click on Topic Options and be able to select "Unsubscribe from this topic only".
Of course, it would also be nice if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Your criteria is wrong. You shouldn't add minimum to the total and the price because in cases there there is anything >0, it will always exceed the minimum which...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Paul White (5/2/2009)
...as I say, it's a shame about the compilation time.
Heh... yeah, I agree... for a million rows, it's a shame. For more common numbers like 8000, all...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Paul White (5/2/2009)
Jeff Moden (5/2/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 5:56 pm
Paul White (5/2/2009)
Well spotted! I must admit I looked at it and gave up after a few minutes...I guess replacing LEN with DATALENGTH might fix it up too?
Paul
Yes... but...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 5:36 pm
george sibbald (5/2/2009)
that would upset the heck out of most auditors unfortunately.
Why? I would think that the lack of security setup by the DBA that allowed it's misuse would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Phil Factor (5/2/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 43,936 through 43,950 (of 59,097 total)