Viewing 15 posts - 42,556 through 42,570 (of 59,102 total)
quayludious (8/4/2009)
Is there a better way than using the inner joins?
If I'm reading your code example correctly, the answer is "yes, absolutely". Please post the code for the function...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Just don't get the idea that you can use any ol' index to do this... It MUST be a clustered index.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:46 pm
willian (8/4/2009)
This code will process each row using @RESULT from one line to another?
I need take the @RESULT from atual row and use it on the next...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:41 pm
Heh... still on a roll, Steve. Keep it going. I am, however, glad you changed your shirt from the last time.
I can't get over how many people are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:35 pm
pzmrcd (8/4/2009)
We have an existing application that uses a table with a Primary ket tat has been set to char[12].
This was developed many years back and due to the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:26 pm
aktikt (8/4/2009)
I'm all ears for anyone who can solve...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Take just five minutes to help us help you. Please read the first link in my signature below. Provide a CREATE TABLE statement and data like in the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:18 pm
Ummmmm.... see if you like the random numbers this gives you... includes some with leading zero's but will always have 13 to 15 digits...
SELECT TOP 100000
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:10 pm
The code you presented works just fine with no indexes except on the Email columns. In order for us to figure this out, you'll need to post the table...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Do you do any other maintenance? Like rebuilding fragmented indexes and the like?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:40 pm
As some have said, buy a copy of the Dev Edition of SQL Server. It's the same as the Enterprise Edition except for two things... the license says you're...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:38 pm
Nothing else runs while auto-growth is occurring and, yes, it will make a given task or set of tasks seem very slow while auto-growth occurs.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Paul White (8/4/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Jack Corbett (8/4/2009)
Guess everyone knew Gail was gone. Not many posts in the corruption forums.
Somehow, that just doesn't sound right. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Bob Hovious (8/4/2009)
Or we could just go back to flat files. Screw relational AND hierarchical databases.
At least it wouldn't have tags in it. 😉 Well... unless...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 4:10 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 42,556 through 42,570 (of 59,102 total)