Viewing 15 posts - 42,541 through 42,555 (of 59,067 total)
AVB (8/4/2009)
Jeff,Good article. I'll have to try that next opportunity I get!
Thanks for the feedback, AVB.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 2:17 pm
I'm pretty sure I can't actually help on this because I don't know well enough what the two procs do, but this is all RBAR... is there no way for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 10:50 am
AVB (8/4/2009)
As far as the function...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 10:37 am
For more information on how the method Lynn used actually works, please see the following article...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/62867/
In the code Lynn posted, he used a really cool CTE similar to what Itzek...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 10:33 am
SQL (8/3/2009)
On a more general note, however, there are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 10:23 am
nigel (8/3/2009)
Jeff Moden (8/2/2009)
Does SSRS have something in it to take an SQL DateTime and format it for display without disturbing the sortability of the underlying SQL DateTime?
Yes, it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:45 am
john.arnott (8/3/2009)
Welcome to SSC and thank you for sharing that function.
You should consider your head safe..... Your post made it clear that defining a function to do...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:41 am
ta.bu.shi.da.yu (8/3/2009)
I'm hoping Jeff Modem can help me on this one 🙂
Heh... thank you for the compliment but, as you can see, I'm not the only show in town. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:29 am
Nah... I didn't miss anything... Andrew not only did it the way I would have, he even cited the same URL I was going to cite where I first saw...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 9:25 am
And this was an accidental double post from above.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:27 am
Sorry... I missed something... had to take the code down from this post... I'll be back.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 4, 2009 at 8:24 am
I'll also add that you should propably get used to this because SET ANSI_PADDING OFF has been deprecated as have the "off" conditions for many ANSI settings have.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2009 at 8:46 pm
I guess I don't understand... textual datatypes are naturally "left justified" and there is no need to RPAD.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Chandu (8/3/2009)
Hi Jeff, I think pande wants the output in the following way
Thanks, Chandu... but, why can't OPs like this get the hint? We had a very simple request......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Thanks Pete... My recommendation still stands... Use an IDENTITY column and have the students remember their "number". I don't know what Gaggle.net is, but let the students create their...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 42,541 through 42,555 (of 59,067 total)