Viewing 15 posts - 41,956 through 41,970 (of 59,102 total)
Oddly enough, if you were to used a Temp table instead of a permanent staging table, you could fix 3 problems...
1. Being able to run parallel jobs concurrently (if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 14, 2009 at 9:46 pm
Thanks for the feedback, Tim. When they get it sorted, I'd sure like to know what the method for determining the week was. Not necessarily the SQL... just...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 14, 2009 at 9:31 pm
rja.carnegie (9/14/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 14, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Roy Oliver (9/14/2009)
Jeff Moden (9/12/2009)
Roy Oliver (9/12/2009)
Interesting... it'd be easier if SQL Server implemented triggers in the same way Oracle did.Why? They are inherently RBAR. "For Each Row".
True,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 14, 2009 at 9:05 pm
danielmanke (9/14/2009)
Sunday was a day for Golf and football... I did see your request for what the CLR (C# code) does. Unfortunately, the application is an off the shelf
ERP...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 14, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Heh... no loops, please... not even in 2k. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 14, 2009 at 10:35 am
Heh... holy moly! I just now found this thread. Needless to say, a whole lot of water has passed under the bridge in the last two years... 3000...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 9:58 pm
From one "Jeff" to another, welcome aboard and I agree... pretty good job for a first post.
To follow up on Bob's good suggestion, take a look at the article at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Please see my previous post above.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 3:32 pm
He might if we could find out what it was about and perhaps make a suggestion on the T-SQL side.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 3:05 pm
winterminute (9/13/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 2:55 pm
Fine... if you don't want to tell me what the CLR does so maybe I can come up with an alternate solution, then enjoy your memory problems. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 2:23 pm
James Stover (9/12/2009)
Irrelevant since we are all going to end up in the Cloud 🙂
BWAA-HAA!! Guess I'm going to have to start hoarding computers. Between the "Eatr" project and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 13, 2009 at 5:46 am
pandeharsh (9/12/2009)
No ,Sql Server we do not use cursor and also in sql server we can do without cursor.
But in oracle I see that using cursor is must.
Also,I read here...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 12, 2009 at 10:27 pm
You might also want to lookup what OUTPUT does for you, as well.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 12, 2009 at 4:51 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 41,956 through 41,970 (of 59,102 total)