Viewing 15 posts - 39,616 through 39,630 (of 59,072 total)
Achiever-785539 (2/25/2010)
Hi All,I have a requirement that i need to concate rows based on the id. with out using cursors
Can any one help me in this??
In Advance Thanks!!
Regards
Siva
Some people...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2010 at 1:09 am
As a sidebar, I think it should be against the law to associate searches with the humans that made them.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2010 at 12:58 am
To add to what Jason stated...
Not that I recommend it, but if you're only going to backup the log once a day, then there's almost no sense in having the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2010 at 12:51 am
miss.delinda (2/26/2010)
Consider as follow,
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tCounter](
[trnxid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL primary key clustered,
[cd] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
[desn] [varchar](50) NOT...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2010 at 12:45 am
Always payments will have more records than pledges.
Gosh... that may be your requirement, but I really find it hard to believe that there will never be an instance where someone...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2010 at 12:39 am
First, I'd change the autogrowth to a fixed number of mega-bytes. Do you really want your 20GB database to grow by 2GB when it needs to?
It sounds like you've...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 11:35 pm
I'm not sure what to tell you about this. Many people had the same problem. While it's true that sp4 made a lot of security updates, sp3A fixed...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 11:24 pm
sandhyarao49 (2/25/2010)
Hi,
It is an update statement from one of the tool hosted on the server.
I've run into that once myself and many times for other people. Please post...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 11:07 pm
If the PK you've selected is the Clustered Index (and they are by default), and the clustered index order doesn't resemble the same order as any INSERTS that may occur,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 11:04 pm
Nathan,
My recommendation would be for you to read the article at the first link in my signature line below. Following the recommendations for how to post in that article...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 10:51 pm
Actually, you've used a form of DELETE that will usually work but can have some serious problems sometime in the future. My recommendation is that you must use both...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 10:45 pm
GilaMonster (2/25/2010)
Run the update in master and use 3-part naming to reference the DB in question. Compat mode is controlled by...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 9:46 pm
B. Hill (2/25/2010)
Good call. Running SQL Server 2005 but the database is in 2000 compatibility mode.Ideas?
Unless you can do what Gail says and run the DB in the 90 compatible...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 1:28 pm
Mike M - DBA2B (2/25/2010)
Well, you, a fellow named Tom(?), and I all used to try to help folks out on another SQL forum about 6 years ago. Tom was...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 1:05 pm
B. Hill (2/25/2010)
2 issues. First, I get the error: 'ROW_NUMBER' is not a recognized function name
second, I want to update the DeptSeq column to the incremented...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2010 at 11:41 am
Viewing 15 posts - 39,616 through 39,630 (of 59,072 total)