Viewing 15 posts - 39,031 through 39,045 (of 59,072 total)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/5/2010)
Please provide your table definitions, and what queries you have tried so far.This will be more helpful and more consumable by the community trying to help you.
I agree with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 7:20 pm
lmu92 (4/5/2010)
...at least use a table-valued function.
Teaching opportunity here, Lutz. Tell the op "why" and how you'd use an iTVF in a computed column. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 7:10 pm
ritu.thatola (4/5/2010)
Jason,I don' know the SQL well.
Hmmmm... then why did they select you to resolve this particular problem? You need to read the writing on the wall... learn SQL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 7:05 pm
ritu.thatola (4/5/2010)
I have below query which runs in SQL server 7
I need help to convert it to run in SQL server 2005, I don't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 6:57 pm
olie480 (4/5/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/5/2010)
olie480 (4/5/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 6:14 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/5/2010)
Jeff Moden (4/4/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 6:07 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/5/2010)
Jeff Moden (4/5/2010)
Tom.Thomson (4/5/2010)
who are prepared to lie about how much testing they have done because they think they will get away with it.
Heh... I love it when...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 5:45 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/5/2010)
Jeff Moden (4/5/2010)
I'd rather see the discussion continue on the thread which started it all rather than essentially double posting. Sorry Jason.
I know. There are reasons to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 5:32 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (4/5/2010)
Why are you doing this? Is it for reporting or are you considering storing the data in this format?
Heh... what the hey... Microsoft saw fit to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 5:31 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/5/2010)
I have started a new thread on this topic.http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic897076-10-1.aspx
Nah.... I'd rather see this discussion continue here instead of essentially double posting. Sorry Jason.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 4:34 pm
I'd rather see the discussion continue on the thread which started it all rather than essentially double posting. Sorry Jason.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 4:32 pm
Heh... everyone forgot how to eliminate all contention for the table immediately... rename the table. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 4:31 pm
if 234 is 02:34 then why on Earth would 1 be anything but 00:01???? :blink:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 4:28 pm
kkapferer (4/5/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 4:25 pm
Do what every screen saver company has been trying to do since computers first came out... turn them into an aquarium! 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 5, 2010 at 4:19 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 39,031 through 39,045 (of 59,072 total)