Viewing 15 posts - 37,681 through 37,695 (of 59,072 total)
smive2003 (7/13/2010)
I have to provide customer account balances and only show customers accounts that have any positive balance against any negative balance from any of up to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 11:02 pm
onlo (7/13/2010)
Some bodies say : for records INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, using clustered index will use more time or resources to complete, is it true ?
To add to what Gail...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 11:00 pm
LutzM (7/12/2010)
DECLARE @sql VARCHAR(6000)
DECLARE @sql1 VARCHAR(500)
DECLARE @sql2 VARCHAR(5000)
DECLARE @sql3 VARCHAR(500)
SET @sql1='
;with cte_group_of8 as
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY claim_id ORDER BY cast(left(claim_sequence_numbers + '','',charindex('','',claim_sequence_numbers)-1)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 10:53 pm
Brandie Tarvin (7/12/2010)
Do a search on phrase "Dynamic Pivot". See if that helps you out. Then post back on this thread with further questions about it.
Pivots are generally slower (and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 10:49 pm
Go to "Services" in Control Panel and make sure that the DTC service is running. Not only should it be running but it should probably also be set to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 pm
John N (7/13/2010)
Figured it out.. use SOUNDEX right?
I'm pretty sure I wouldn't use SOUNDEX... it's a little too "fuzzy" for my taste.
I haven't had to use it myself but...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 10:28 pm
RakeshRSingh (7/13/2010)
1. First the From clause will be processed
2. Then WHERE clause will be processed
3. Then SELECT clause will...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 10:22 pm
A short, sweet, and brilliant article! Bravo Stephen and spot on on all points especially on working with your "customers".
There's only one problem with the scenario you're given... what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 10:11 pm
I agree with the others. Things could break if the DRI is violated or PKs aren't created using IDENTITY, etc.
My recommendation would be to do the same thing as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 9:42 pm
deepthi818 (7/13/2010)
I am an SQL Server DBA with 3 years of experience, I have some experience in SSIS. I am not an expert in SSIS, but am looking at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 9:31 pm
mbender (7/13/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 9:28 pm
mazzz (7/13/2010)
It's as I feared then - I will at any rate have 1000 distinct OLE DB Sources/Destinations to put together.
I counted the tables, there are actually 3000 of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 9:22 pm
Heh... who's going to decide what a good answer is... the Original Poster? Let me tell you some of the reasons why that's such a bad idea...
1. Despite...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 9:10 pm
Here's an article on passing data as if it were a 1, 2, or 3 dimensional array...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63003/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 8:51 pm
doobya (7/12/2010)
forum dwellers do tend to get upset when the status quo / comfort zone of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 7:42 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 37,681 through 37,695 (of 59,072 total)