Viewing 15 posts - 37,426 through 37,440 (of 59,072 total)
David Portas (7/31/2010)
Tom.Thomson (7/29/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2010 at 2:06 pm
shishirbabel (7/30/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2010 at 1:50 pm
sql dba kittu (7/31/2010)
My bad uck they didn't provide me...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2010 at 1:34 pm
Ok... after reading this a second time, I have to ask... what about performance? Under optimal conditions (ie. correct indexes on the table), which method(s) will actually be the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2010 at 12:59 pm
LutzM (8/1/2010)
You should start a new thread in the SSIS forum if you're looking for a SSIS solution.
Also, please read and follow the advice given in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2010 at 12:08 pm
dant12 (7/31/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Looking at the "Tally" table code that someone else wrote, I can certainly see why it's so slow. No chance of the clustered index being used there!
Thanks for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2010 at 8:27 pm
I know this is an old post but I had to say "Hear Here!" to it. Great post Tony. Phil is absolutely correct about how even the worst...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2010 at 7:56 pm
Try this, Thiango... it may even give your .Net code a run for it's money. It's 32 to 64 times faster than the T-SQL Function you wrote. If...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 31, 2010 at 1:53 pm
Agreed... especially on the environment thing. We had the joy of doing cross-domain across servers through a fire wall on SOX compliant systems on one side and "open" systems...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2010 at 9:08 am
Bhuvnesh (7/30/2010)
Jeff Moden (7/29/2010)
Bhuvnesh (7/28/2010)
Jeff Moden (7/28/2010)
you'd need a loop for that.or may be batch approach can make work smoother
The loop would control "batches". That being said, what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2010 at 9:03 am
Steve Jones - Editor (7/30/2010)
The Colorado event is in South Denver, #52
Thanks, Steve... doesn't look like there's any shortage of speakers for that one. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2010 at 9:02 am
Heh... I guess it depends on what one's definition of "set based" is. Either way, I sure appreciate your feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2010 at 8:50 am
You spoke of a Denver event and I don't see that on the list anywhere.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2010 at 11:39 pm
You should submit this as an article, Jeff.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2010 at 11:12 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 37,426 through 37,440 (of 59,072 total)