Viewing 15 posts - 36,406 through 36,420 (of 59,067 total)
I've been waiting because it seems that the requirements for this problem have been modified several times thoughout this thread. Soooooo.... let's make sure the requirements are actually very...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 9:36 am
GilaMonster (10/8/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/8/2010)
Why wouldn't "Federated Servers" in SQL Server do the same thing?
That's when you split a database across multiple servers so that each holds a piece.
RAC has multiple...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 6:39 am
vilonel (10/8/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 6:33 am
Very cool, Pavel. Thanks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 6:30 am
craig-404139 (10/7/2010)
WayneS (10/7/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/7/2010)
So... without me running all the code presented so far, what has been decided? Does the numbering restart for each prefix or not?
k from the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 6:26 am
Gianluca Sartori (10/8/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/7/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 3:12 am
Gianluca Sartori (10/7/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/7/2010)
saurabh.deshpande (10/7/2010)
Can we have anything like Oracle RAC available in SQL Server.
Thanks
What is "Oracle RAC"?
Oracle RAC stands for Real Application Cluster, that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 3:04 am
The Dixie Flatline (10/7/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 2:55 am
Roy Ernest (10/7/2010)
Anybody looking for chairs or recliners?How do we report spam?
Hit the [Report] button instead of the [Quote] button and leave a quick note "Looks like spam".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 2:50 am
WayneS (10/7/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (10/7/2010)
GilaMonster (10/7/2010)
This has got to take some form of prize. http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1000227.aspxTime to get the crystal ball out again.
Apparently it's my turn to feel snippy. I couldn't resist.
IMO,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 2:43 am
{edit} Removed my comment. People may have taken it the wrong way.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 2:37 am
{edit} Removed my comment. People may have taken it the wrong way.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 7, 2010 at 10:55 pm
ramses2nd (10/7/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 7, 2010 at 10:40 pm
Raunak Jhawar (10/7/2010)
The table names are repeating(Domain Name etc. as you scroll down the file) as per the descrption provided.
And?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 7, 2010 at 10:36 pm
Gianluca Sartori (10/7/2010)
CREATE PROCEDURE [getSequence]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE @newVal int
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE SequenceTable
SET @newVal = Sequence = Sequence + 1
COMMIT
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
DECLARE @ErrorMessage NVARCHAR(4000);
DECLARE @ErrorSeverity INT;
DECLARE...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 7, 2010 at 10:30 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 36,406 through 36,420 (of 59,067 total)