Viewing 15 posts - 36,391 through 36,405 (of 59,067 total)
I believe that the MAXDOP 1 option and TABLOCKX hint are still required.
Unless parallel processing jumped in at just the right spot, the serial processing of a single CPU is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2010 at 5:11 pm
erwin.oosterhoorn (10/8/2010)
I am getting intrigued now, Jeff removed his comment twice...
Actually, just once. I hit {QUOTE} instead of edit during the first edit and it spawned another post instead...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2010 at 10:56 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (10/8/2010)
grahamc (10/8/2010)
So if its a memory, CPU issue, it will scale.... Cool!!! Thank you makes a little more sense now
The focus of Oracle RAC is high availability 🙂
You...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2010 at 10:47 am
Gianluca Sartori (10/8/2010)
At last, Mr. Celko gives a polite and useful answer to a poor-worded question.It's nice to see everyone can learn.
Heh... the lion sleeps. That wasn't being polite...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2010 at 10:43 am
Heh... I'm paranoid but I'm not sure that I'm paranoid enough. 😛 It turns out that I changed the test data and had done some formatting for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2010 at 10:22 am
WayneS (10/10/2010)
I did notice one, well, issue with it. It is assuming that the control numbers will have a prefix, followed by 9 zero-padded...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2010 at 9:21 am
ahmed.net (10/9/2010)
Table Structure:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tbl_test](
[ID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Title] [varchar](500) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_tbl_test] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 11:35 pm
jeffrey.davis (10/9/2010)
I am trying to create a function that will return a table result that will have ID and COUNT. I am trying to create...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 8:26 pm
reggie burns-317942 (10/7/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 8:15 pm
bitbucket-25253 (10/9/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 7:59 pm
Mordred (10/9/2010)
Thanks for your response. I agree with that logic but then why are there so many that would say 55 is the tenth I wonder?
Mostly because they start...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 7:56 pm
mjswart (9/22/2010)
Records aren't always stored physically ordered on a data page. Most of the time they are physically ordered correctly, but the actual order comes from the slot...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 6:38 pm
IIRC, by definition, the first Fibonacci number is refererred to as F0 = 0 and F1 = 1 soooooo the TENTH number is actually F9 = 34.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 5:54 pm
{edit} My apologies... I had posted some code here and then think I found a bug later. I took the code down until I can determine if it's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 1:21 pm
[edit] Just an FYI... It would appear that the Zip file still contains the original 13 nulls.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2010 at 9:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 36,391 through 36,405 (of 59,067 total)