Viewing 15 posts - 22,936 through 22,950 (of 59,067 total)
GilaMonster (8/11/2014)
Jeff Moden (8/11/2014)
Now that would be nice in "regular" T-SQL.Err.. It is in regular T-SQL, from SQL 2014 onwards.
I'm so far behind that I'll need to be twins...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 4:43 pm
pawana.paul (8/11/2014)
Need your help.
I joined new environment. There is one table of 1.6 TB which has 16 partations. SQL Server Version is 2008 R2. We are planning to perform maintenance...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 4:16 pm
chrisn-585491 (8/11/2014)
Jeff,Sent you a private message with a link. Didn't want to unleash the wolves.
Thanks!
Chris
Understood. Thanks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 2:41 pm
Now that would be nice in "regular" T-SQL. Thanks for jumping in, Gail.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 12:56 pm
chrisn-585491 (8/11/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 10:53 am
sektor81 (8/11/2014)
CREATE TABLE Consumer
(
Account nvarchar(20) null,
Consumption...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 10:51 am
Beatrix Kiddo (8/11/2014)
Some of these sound more like questions I'd ask of a developer (or a Development DBA, maybe).
That too! I do like DBAs that actually know something about...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2014 at 9:28 am
Has anyone actually used this feature in production, yet?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2014 at 9:20 pm
For single row queries normally associated with the front end, fragmentation means almost nothing because you're stuck with looking up single rows.
For batch file code, I normally don't test against...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2014 at 9:16 pm
New_2SQL (8/10/2014)
On my laptop the old source code took 546ms whereas your new source code took 124ms only. Very good improvement.
For how many rows in the tables?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2014 at 9:06 pm
alex_pixley (8/8/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2014 at 9:13 am
Ah. Gotcha.
I also enforce a set of fairly strict but very easy to comply with set of standards both at work and upon myself.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2014 at 9:02 am
TeraByteMe (8/9/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2014 at 2:39 pm
GilaMonster (8/9/2014)
sqlfriends (8/8/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2014 at 10:50 am
churlbut (8/7/2014)
How about Security, who needs access/what kind of access.
+1 Billion. I also want to know if there are things like personally identifiable information (especially tax IDs, CC #s,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2014 at 10:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 22,936 through 22,950 (of 59,067 total)