Viewing 15 posts - 22,351 through 22,365 (of 59,072 total)
Jeff Moden (11/26/2014)
SQLRNNR (11/26/2014)
I decided to down vote this one. Everybody should just go to Oracle where they already have the functionality. (devil)😛
BWAAAA-HAAAAA-HAAAA!!!! I thought you were...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 26, 2014 at 8:04 am
WayneS (11/26/2014)
Jeff - do you happen to know what the vote count was before you posted your request to up-vote the connect item?
I forgot to write it down but I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 26, 2014 at 7:59 am
SQLRNNR (11/26/2014)
I decided to down vote this one. Everybody should just go to Oracle where they already have the functionality. (devil)
😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 26, 2014 at 7:55 am
Eirikur Eiriksson (11/25/2014)
Jeff Moden (11/25/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 10:09 pm
BTW... I don't mean to make partitioning sound so easy. It can be a real booger to setup especially if you have a bunch of indexes that aren't temporal...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 10:04 pm
Sagar-636902 (11/25/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 10:00 pm
Yet Another DBA (11/24/2014)
Drift?? More like herding cats!!!
BWAAA_HAAAA!!!! (Sorry... did that come out loud?) 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 9:34 pm
Shifting gears real hard, could you good folks take a look at the following post? I think it's a really important subject even if I wasn't the one to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 9:29 pm
Thanks Koen and Eirikur!
How about it folks? There a 1.7 million of you out there. Can we get a few more votes on this important subject? Thanks....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 9:25 pm
JoshDBGuy (11/25/2014)
We have dozens of stored procs with sp_executesql inside the procs. When I run an analysis to determine long-running queries, these are acting as if they are ad-hoc. Is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 9:17 pm
Sagar-636902 (11/25/2014)
Thanks both for the Reply,it is sql server 2012 enterprise edition sp1
Then there's no reason why you couldn't delve into the useful if not slightly painful realm of using...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 8:38 pm
Heh... "Holy shades of 'Office Space', Batman!"
I've had some time to do deeper dive on your request and, although I could certainly be wrong, I think there's a fundamental flaw...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 8:32 pm
qew420 (11/25/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 7:30 pm
Sagar-636902 (11/20/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 7:20 pm
arnipetursson (11/25/2014)
Books online suggest reorg if fragmentation is < 28%
On a large table, 28% is an awful lot of fragmentation. Further, reorganization is fully logged no matter what the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 25, 2014 at 7:16 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 22,351 through 22,365 (of 59,072 total)