Viewing 15 posts - 21,766 through 21,780 (of 59,098 total)
First of all, you need to define what is meant by "the difference in months" because I'm pretty sure that you didn't mean for the following to represent a whole...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2015 at 7:29 am
Doesn't Intellisense do what you want here? Or are you looking for the datatype and constraints, etc, as well?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 23, 2015 at 7:24 am
gconte 55278 (1/22/2015)
Sorry about that, I provided the results instead of everything. Iv'e added the four missing fields on the attached.
That's nice but please see the first link under...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 11:19 pm
Putting your audit table on a separate database has some serious advantages and won't degrade performance at all.
Putting your audit table on a separate server with or without any form...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 11:14 pm
rash3554 (1/22/2015)
Begin
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @RowCount1 INTEGER;
UPDATE dbo.Employee set dbo.fnFormatAddress(Address) = Address
where EmpCountry='USA'
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 11:10 pm
rash3554 (1/22/2015)
I don't think we have are approved to use CASS in our company.Thanks
R
The answer is always "No" until you ask. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 11:03 pm
Scott Coleman (1/22/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 10:33 pm
For the long haul, I'd suggest modifying the code to always put the smaller of the two IDs in ID1, a check constraint on ID1 that enforces ID1 <= ID2,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 10:22 pm
Looking at your questions, the answer to all of them is "It Depends" because you haven't told us what that "Main Table" is being used for. Is that the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 10:17 pm
sm_iransoftware (1/22/2015)
and dba-120883, About your reply.
In step 5 :
#5. Baseline the System
- Use tools like Performance Monitor, SQL Profiler, Active SPID Performance
1- Which Counters Do I control in performance...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 10:10 pm
Actually, I'm totally wrong. The 2 most important things are...
1. Locate the coffee machine.
2. Locate the Men's Room.
😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 10:01 pm
WayneS (1/22/2015)
Jeff Moden (1/22/2015)
WayneS (1/22/2015)
Any Threadizens going to either the Austin or Cleveland SQL Saturday? I'd love to meet up with you!
I've need seen you since you got your MCM....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 9:30 pm
ericb1 (1/22/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 8:15 pm
Perhaps a simplified version of the method in the following article would do. It would also help a lot with other things you might ask of the hierarchical data.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/94570/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 8:01 pm
To add to my suggestions on the Employee table, I just don't understand the need for a "ChangeType" column in the Employee table unless it means something totally different than...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2015 at 7:55 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 21,766 through 21,780 (of 59,098 total)