Viewing 15 posts - 11,851 through 11,865 (of 22,214 total)
I'm with Paul. I've done it both ways successfully, but the only way that splitting the database really worked well was if the structure was changed in the archive system...
September 14, 2011 at 4:08 am
Jan Van der Eecken (9/13/2011)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/13/2011)
They could even go to something like cloud services for production data and local servers for historical data.
Steve, please enlighten me,...
September 14, 2011 at 4:05 am
It could be bad parameter sniffing (differentiated because parameter sniffing is going on constantly and helps you). You need to get a copy of the execution plan when the query...
September 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
Read my book. It's down there in my signature.
September 14, 2011 at 3:59 am
In general, a correlated sub-query in the SELECT list can lead to poor performance. You're usually better off finding some way to move that down into the FROM clause.
If...
September 14, 2011 at 3:57 am
Of the year? I think I'd put it down to of the decade, but that's not what the contest was. Regardless, congratulations Jeff. You earned it! Can't wait for the...
September 14, 2011 at 3:40 am
A single file also means if the file gets corrupted, you lose one backup, not all of them.
September 13, 2011 at 8:26 am
Jpotucek (9/13/2011)
I AM doing regular Databases backups Full nightly Database backups and Transaction Log backups where appropriate and depending on the SLA with the...
September 13, 2011 at 8:21 am
Piling on a bit, because it's a point worth making.
Most backup products are not aware of the fact that SQL Server has this pesky little function called a transaction. So,...
September 13, 2011 at 6:54 am
Bob Fazio (9/12/2011)
The reason why we are leaning towards the patch, is because I think everyone agrees, one bad...
September 12, 2011 at 3:41 pm
Chad Crawford (9/12/2011)
September 12, 2011 at 1:57 pm
The performance counters would be primarily waits and queues, but you need to combine perfmon with query behavior. You can't just measure one or just the other. What's the page...
September 12, 2011 at 9:35 am
Since this is a reporting system, you might not want to go as high with the cost threshold, 25-30, which means your average cost of 35 might still get parallelism.
CXPacket...
September 12, 2011 at 8:26 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/12/2011)
Imagine losing 1 out of 100 dbs. It's annoying to very problematic, but if ALL of them go...
September 12, 2011 at 5:59 am
nikk_Stone (9/10/2011)
thnx...but the book which you have told me...it is not free of cost...
i have to buy it online...
i want a frre book
There are some free books out there. But,...
September 12, 2011 at 5:47 am
Viewing 15 posts - 11,851 through 11,865 (of 22,214 total)