Viewing 15 posts - 6,916 through 6,930 (of 22,211 total)
Break apart the transactions so that they're smaller. Only move chunks of the data in order to make the transaction size smaller. There are a number of different documents online...
January 13, 2015 at 6:27 am
Unless we're looking at some of kind of terminology mix up. Maybe you meant RID, or Row Identifier, which is a marker placed on rows in a heap table. Just...
January 13, 2015 at 6:24 am
You could use the ROW_NUMBER function and just add your starting value to output of the query. For example, if you want to start counting at 7, you add 6...
January 13, 2015 at 4:50 am
I would just script out the dependent objects, drop them and recreate them. That's going to be the safest way to ensure you get it right.
I'm pretty sure that's...
January 13, 2015 at 4:26 am
I've seen the output of ROW_NUMBER() referred to as row index (incorrectly), but other than that, I'm with Gail. I don't understand the question.
January 13, 2015 at 4:20 am
You really can't. You're telling the engine to do anything it has to in order to remove the corruption within the structures. That will result in, at minimum, the loss...
January 13, 2015 at 4:15 am
Maybe I misunderstood the question then. You're saying that they already have built an empty database, but this time it's got new structures, different table layout, etc., in addition to...
January 13, 2015 at 4:10 am
A TOP without an ORDER BY means you could see data duplication or missing data. This is because you're not guaranteed to get the results back in any particular order,...
January 12, 2015 at 8:14 pm
If it's a one-time data move, the easiest is going to be to just do a restore. You can drop all the objects on the other side after the restore....
January 12, 2015 at 8:09 pm
Since you can't add a second tempdb, adding a file is the way to go. Here's a good review[/url] on how to pick tempdb file settings. There are a bunch...
January 12, 2015 at 4:11 pm
If the SAN goes, and they do, you lose all your backups. Yes, I would absolutely have a second location. Tape at least.
January 12, 2015 at 4:08 pm
Honestly I don't know where to go in the NAS, but that's gotta have some of the source of info.
January 12, 2015 at 4:05 pm
Restarting the server because of a NAS problem, even if it's just backups, doesn't give me a warm & fuzzy, at all. Combining the fact of your NAS problems with...
January 12, 2015 at 12:30 pm
That wait type means that SQL Server is waiting on the operating system. It sounds like you may have a problem with your NAS. Is it sharing the network with...
January 12, 2015 at 12:04 pm
And cross-posting doesn't help. We just get fragmented conversations.
Please redirect further posts to here.
January 12, 2015 at 11:57 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,916 through 6,930 (of 22,211 total)