Viewing 15 posts - 21,616 through 21,630 (of 22,202 total)
Ignore my last post. It's utterly wrong.
October 23, 2007 at 8:54 am
It is a security issue. You have to make that determination for yourself. It's off by default. Run sp_configure. It's the setting 'Remote Proc Trans' and setting it to 1...
October 23, 2007 at 6:47 am
What problems specifically are you worried about or experiencing?
54 million rows that are composed of one integer column just isn't going to be an issue. Are you experiecing fragementation of...
October 23, 2007 at 6:40 am
The issue you're running into is the logical processing order. The SELECT list is processed after the FROM, ON, JOIN, WHERE, GROUP BY, WITH, HAVING clauses. Any reference to items...
October 22, 2007 at 11:36 am
The variant doesn't scare me (much), but everything into one table? How many users are expected to access this? What does the indexing look like? Has anyone vetted the design...
October 22, 2007 at 9:21 am
Yeah, I mean, we had every single possible good technical, security and performance reason not to give them what they asked for. However, they trumped all those with a phone...
October 22, 2007 at 7:03 am
You're trying to combine the function of EXEC where it executes an ad hoc sql string with the function of exec where it captures the return status of the execution...
October 22, 2007 at 6:59 am
DBA's & Developers, yeah, they should get it because it does have the tools they need to get the job done.
End-users... Why on earth are the end-users generating ad hoc...
October 22, 2007 at 6:41 am
Or you could use COALESCE
INSERT INTO [dbo].[TableA]
([Col1],
[Col2],
[Col3])
SELECT
COALESCE([Col1],'unknown'),
COALESCE([Col2],'unknown'),
COALESCE([Col3],'unkown'
FROM [dbo].[TableB];
If you're using the VALUES statement on insert, you can use the default value:
VALUES
(DEFAULT,
'Something',
'Something)
But if you really wanted the defaults to...
October 22, 2007 at 6:36 am
insane_professional (10/22/2007)
What i want to do is...
October 22, 2007 at 6:23 am
You can do this with client side code in VB. It works, but it's not the best choice since you're sacrificing the power of SQL Server in order to put...
October 22, 2007 at 6:14 am
Sorry, I'm stumped. I couldn't do both. I got to learn a bit about the query and value methods of xml data types that I wasn't that aware of, but...
October 19, 2007 at 12:39 pm
ecreese (10/19/2007)
Msg 421, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The xml data type cannot be selected as DISTINCT because it is not...
October 19, 2007 at 12:10 pm
I tested using the original query, not the DISTINCT. Hang on.
October 19, 2007 at 11:40 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,616 through 21,630 (of 22,202 total)