Viewing 15 posts - 19,411 through 19,425 (of 22,202 total)
danschl (10/17/2008)
Specifies that the query is optimized for fast retrieval of the first number_rows. This is a nonnegative integer. After the first number_rows are returned, the query continues execution...
October 20, 2008 at 6:02 am
Still, that's information. I'll set up a test database over the weekend and try a couple of things.
I have to wonder why on earth it would matter...
October 17, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Interesting.
What query or queries did you run against it to get a recommendation?
I can't imagine that the database would matter, but the one I'm using is the 2008 version of...
October 17, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Execution plan?
October 17, 2008 at 11:10 am
It will treat them, as much as it can, as a whole. But the more complicated the query, the longer it will take the optimizer to find a good plan....
October 17, 2008 at 10:53 am
I'm sorry, no, I can't.
The basic structures look a lot like what you see in the article.
I've got another article coming out in the SQL Standard this month that compares...
October 17, 2008 at 10:50 am
What do the indexes on these tables look like? For example, because of this statement:
AND ap.ProcedureID <> ap1.ProcedureID
If ProcedureID is the leading edge of the index used in the...
October 17, 2008 at 9:17 am
That really sounds almost identical to the system we did with history & inprocess tables. While we migrated between the two, the structures and queries were pretty much as I...
October 17, 2008 at 8:59 am
You're referring to the same table twice for some reason. This should be enough
SELECT FIRST_NAME, USER_ID
FROM EMPLOYEE
LEFT OUTER JOIN USER_PGM_AUTHORITY ON EMPLOYEE.FIRST_NAME = USER_PGM_AUTHORITY.USER_ID
WHERE FIRST_NAME = USER_ID
The listing of...
October 17, 2008 at 8:32 am
Oops. Missed that entirely. Thanks Matt.
October 17, 2008 at 8:25 am
The second versioned system we created had an Inprocess and a History storage. The Inprocess was a multi-day or even multi-week approval process. Once approved, the new version and the...
October 17, 2008 at 8:24 am
The areas I've been looking at are:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144250(SQL.90).aspx
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms180175(SQL.90).aspx
I'm just not sure how this translates the data on the screen.
I tried this, but it didn't work:
select N'????????' COLLATE Chinese_PRC_BIN as china
...
October 17, 2008 at 8:07 am
The areas I've been looking at are:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144250(SQL.90).aspx
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms180175(SQL.90).aspx
I'm just not sure how this translates the data on the screen.
I tried this, but it didn't work:
select N'????????' COLLATE Chinese_PRC_BIN as china
...
October 17, 2008 at 7:57 am
You need to modify the code page in your query window to appropriately display the data. I'm actually not entirely sure how to do that.
October 17, 2008 at 7:44 am
We built a similar system. I outline the design and our tests in this article [/url]at Simple-Talk. To summarize, we create a version table, to which all the other tables...
October 17, 2008 at 6:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 19,411 through 19,425 (of 22,202 total)